These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27577453)

  • 1. Optimizing Digital Health Informatics Interventions Through Unobtrusive Quantitative Process Evaluations.
    Gude WT; van der Veer SN; de Keizer NF; Coiera E; Peek N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 228():594-8. PubMed ID: 27577453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Case for Conceptual and Computable Cross-Fertilization Between Audit and Feedback and Clinical Decision Support.
    Brown B; Peek N; Buchan I
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():419-23. PubMed ID: 26262084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A multidimensional approach to assessing intervention fidelity in a process evaluation of audit and feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions: a study protocol.
    Lorencatto F; Gould NJ; McIntyre SA; During C; Bird J; Walwyn R; Cicero R; Glidewell L; Hartley S; Stanworth SJ; Foy R; Grimshaw JM; Michie S; Francis JJ;
    Implement Sci; 2016 Dec; 11(1):163. PubMed ID: 27955683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utilizing patient data from the veterans administration electronic health record to support web-based clinical decision support: informatics challenges and issues from three clinical domains.
    Rajeevan N; Niehoff KM; Charpentier P; Levin FL; Justice A; Brandt CA; Fried TR; Miller PL
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Jul; 17(1):111. PubMed ID: 28724368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A rapid assessment process for clinical informatics interventions.
    Ash JS; Sittig DF; McMullen CK; Guappone K; Dykstra R; Carpenter J
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; 2008():26-30. PubMed ID: 18999075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Translating clinical informatics interventions into routine clinical care: how can the RE-AIM framework help?
    Bakken S; Ruland CM
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2009; 16(6):889-97. PubMed ID: 19717799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The implementation, use and sustainability of a clinical decision support system for medication optimisation in primary care: A qualitative evaluation.
    Jeffries M; Salema NE; Laing L; Shamsuddin A; Sheikh A; Avery A; Chuter A; Waring J; Keers RN
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250946. PubMed ID: 33939750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Process evaluation in the field: global learnings from seven implementation research hypertension projects in low-and middle-income countries.
    Limbani F; Goudge J; Joshi R; Maar MA; Miranda JJ; Oldenburg B; Parker G; Pesantes MA; Riddell MA; Salam A; Trieu K; Thrift AG; Van Olmen J; Vedanthan R; Webster R; Yeates K; Webster J;
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):953. PubMed ID: 31340828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Control Theory to Design and Evaluate Audit and Feedback Interventions.
    Gude WT; Peek N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Jul; 263():159-170. PubMed ID: 31411161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials.
    Hartley S; Foy R; Walwyn REA; Cicero R; Farrin AJ; Francis JJ; Lorencatto F; Gould NJ; Grant-Casey J; Grimshaw JM; Glidewell L; Michie S; Morris S; Stanworth SJ;
    Implement Sci; 2017 Jul; 12(1):84. PubMed ID: 28673310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The contextual nature of usability and its relevance to medical informatics.
    Svanaes D; Das A; Alsos OA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():541-6. PubMed ID: 18487787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advancing the literature on designing audit and feedback interventions: identifying theory-informed hypotheses.
    Colquhoun HL; Carroll K; Eva KW; Grimshaw JM; Ivers N; Michie S; Sales A; Brehaut JC
    Implement Sci; 2017 Sep; 12(1):117. PubMed ID: 28962632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design and implementation of a standards-based interoperable clinical decision support architecture in the context of the Korean EHR.
    Cho I; Kim J; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim Y
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Sep; 79(9):611-22. PubMed ID: 20620098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electronic audit and feedback intervention with action implementation toolbox to improve pain management in intensive care: protocol for a laboratory experiment and cluster randomised trial.
    Gude WT; Roos-Blom MJ; van der Veer SN; de Jonge E; Peek N; Dongelmans DA; de Keizer NF
    Implement Sci; 2017 May; 12(1):68. PubMed ID: 28545535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic review of electronic audit and feedback: intervention effectiveness and use of behaviour change theory.
    Tuti T; Nzinga J; Njoroge M; Brown B; Peek N; English M; Paton C; van der Veer SN
    Implement Sci; 2017 May; 12(1):61. PubMed ID: 28494799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care.
    Gude WT; Roos-Blom MJ; van der Veer SN; Dongelmans DA; de Jonge E; Peek N; de Keizer NF
    Implement Sci; 2019 Sep; 14(1):90. PubMed ID: 31533841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can hospital audit teams identify case management problems, analyse their causes, identify and implement improvements? A cross-sectional process evaluation of obstetric near-miss case reviews in Benin.
    Borchert M; Goufodji S; Alihonou E; Delvaux T; Saizonou J; Kanhonou L; Filippi V
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2012 Oct; 12():109. PubMed ID: 23057707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical informatics in the intensive care unit: overview of technology assessment.
    Adhikari N; Lapinsky SE
    J Crit Care; 2003 Mar; 18(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 12640613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.