317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27578047)
1. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values.
Bickel H; Pinker K; Polanec S; Magometschnigg H; Wengert G; Spick C; Bogner W; Bago-Horvath Z; Helbich TH; Baltzer P
Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):1883-1892. PubMed ID: 27578047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two Different Methods of Region-of-Interest Placement for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions by Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value.
Gity M; Moradi B; Arami R; Arabkheradmand A; Kazemi MA
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Oct; 19(10):2765-2770. PubMed ID: 30360604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior mediastinum: inter-observer reproducibility of five different methods of region-of-interest positioning.
Priola AM; Priola SM; Parlatano D; Gned D; Giraudo MT; Giardino R; Ferrero B; Ardissone F; Veltri A
Eur Radiol; 2017 Apr; 27(4):1386-1394. PubMed ID: 27516357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Orbital Tumors: Diagnostic Performance of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Based on Region of Interest Selection Method.
Xu XQ; Hu H; Su GY; Liu H; Shi HB; Wu FY
Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(5):650-6. PubMed ID: 27587953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in ovarian tumor: Effect of region-of-interest methods on ADC values and diagnostic ability.
Mukuda N; Fujii S; Inoue C; Fukunaga T; Tanabe Y; Itamochi H; Ogawa T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):720-5. PubMed ID: 26201495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment and quantification of sources of variability in breast apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements at diffusion weighted imaging.
Giannotti E; Waugh S; Priba L; Davis Z; Crowe E; Vinnicombe S
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1729-36. PubMed ID: 26078100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in 3.0 Tesla Breast MRI: Diagnostic Performance and Tumor Characterization Using Small Subregions vs. Whole Tumor Regions of Interest.
Arponen O; Sudah M; Masarwah A; Taina M; Rautiainen S; Könönen M; Sironen R; Kosma VM; Sutela A; Hakumäki J; Vanninen R
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0138702. PubMed ID: 26458106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis be helpful to evaluate breast phyllode tumor grades?
Guo Y; Tang WJ; Kong QC; Liang YY; Han XR; Zheng BJ; Sun L; Wei XH; Jin Z; Liu CL
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():25-31. PubMed ID: 31005172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in endometrial carcinoma: effect of region of interest methods on ADC values.
Inoue C; Fujii S; Kaneda S; Fukunaga T; Kaminou T; Kigawa J; Harada T; Ogawa T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 40(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 24677497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Histological Characterization of Rectal Cancer: Impact of Different Region-of-Interest Positioning Protocols on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements.
Peng Y; Xu C; Hu X; Shen Y; Hu D; Kamel I; Li Z
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jun; 127():109028. PubMed ID: 32361587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in glioma: Influence of region-of-interest determination methods on apparent diffusion coefficient values, interobserver variability, time efficiency, and diagnostic ability.
Han X; Suo S; Sun Y; Zu J; Qu J; Zhou Y; Chen Z; Xu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Mar; 45(3):722-730. PubMed ID: 27527072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is there a systematic bias of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements of the breast if measured on different workstations? An inter- and intra-reader agreement study.
Clauser P; Marcon M; Maieron M; Zuiani C; Bazzocchi M; Baltzer PA
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2291-6. PubMed ID: 26443604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variability.
Nogueira L; Brandão S; Matos E; Nunes RG; Ferreira HA; Loureiro J; Ramos I
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 25698095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of measurement method on interobserver variability of apparent diffusion coefficient of lesions in prostate MRI.
Takahashi H; Yoshida K; Kawashima A; Lee NJ; Froemming AT; Adamo DA; Khandelwal A; Bolan CW; Heller MT; Hartman RP; Kim B; Philbrick KA; Carter RE; Mynderse LA; Humphreys MR; Cai JC; Takahashi N
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268829. PubMed ID: 35604891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of testicular germ cell neoplasms: Effect of ROI methods on apparent diffusion coefficient values and interobserver variability.
Tsili AC; Ntorkou A; Astrakas L; Xydis V; Tsampalas S; Sofikitis N; Argyropoulou MI
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():1-6. PubMed ID: 28267523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Is a Sufficient Conventional Diffusion-weighted MRI Metric to Improve Breast MRI Diagnostic Performance: Results from the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group A6702 Diffusion Imaging Trial.
McDonald ES; Romanoff J; Rahbar H; Kitsch AE; Harvey SM; Whisenant JG; Yankeelov TE; Moy L; DeMartini WB; Dogan BE; Yang WT; Wang LC; Joe BN; Wilmes LJ; Hylton NM; Oh KY; Tudorica LA; Neal CH; Malyarenko DI; Comstock CE; Schnall MD; Chenevert TL; Partridge SC
Radiology; 2021 Jan; 298(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 33201788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diffusion-weighted quantitative MRI of pleural abnormalities: Intra- and interobserver variability in the apparent diffusion coefficient measurements.
Priola AM; Priola SM; Gned D; Giraudo MT; Brundu M; Righi L; Veltri A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Sep; 46(3):769-782. PubMed ID: 28117923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A preliminary study of the effect of region of interest on ADC values and interobserver variability.
Ma C; Liu L; Li J; Wang L; Chen LG; Zhang Y; Chen SY; Lu JP
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):407-13. PubMed ID: 26182908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative Assessment of Breast Tumor: Comparison of Four Methods of Positioning Region of Interest for Synthetic Relaxometry and Diffusion Measurement.
Gao W; Yang Q; Li X; Zhang Y; He T; Liang W; Wei X; Yang M; Gao B; Zhang G; Zhang S
Acad Radiol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38508932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of breast masses as benign or malignant at 3.0T MRI with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Suo S; Zhang K; Cao M; Suo X; Hua J; Geng X; Chen J; Zhuang Z; Ji X; Lu Q; Wang H; Xu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 26343918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
