307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27578318)
1. Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation rates: a case study of medical physics and biomedical engineering: what gets cited and what doesn't?
Trapp J
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2016 Dec; 39(4):817-823. PubMed ID: 27578318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals.
Kulkarni AV; Aziz B; Shams I; Busse JW
JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(10):1092-6. PubMed ID: 19738094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science.
Bakkalbasi N; Bauer K; Glover J; Wang L
Biomed Digit Libr; 2006 Jun; 3():7. PubMed ID: 16805916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative bibliometric analysis of the top 150 cited papers in hypospadiology (1945-2013).
O'Kelly F; Nason GJ; McLoughlin LC; Flood HD; Thornhill JA
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):85.e1-85.e11. PubMed ID: 25819379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variations in Citations Across Databases: Implications for Journal Impact Factors.
Moustafa K
Semin Ophthalmol; 2024 Jul; 39(5):400-403. PubMed ID: 38415757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The difference in referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
Anker MS; Hadzibegovic S; Lena A; Haverkamp W
ESC Heart Fail; 2019 Dec; 6(6):1291-1312. PubMed ID: 31886636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Croatian Medical Journal citation score in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
Sember M; Utrobicić A; Petrak J
Croat Med J; 2010 Apr; 51(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 20401951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Citations and the h index of soil researchers and journals in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
Minasny B; Hartemink AE; McBratney A; Jang HJ
PeerJ; 2013; 1():e183. PubMed ID: 24167778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.
Falagas ME; Pitsouni EI; Malietzis GA; Pappas G
FASEB J; 2008 Feb; 22(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 17884971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Scientometrics and bibliometrics of biomedical engineering periodicals and papers].
Zhao P; Xu P; Li B; Wang Z
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Sep; 20(3):515-20. PubMed ID: 14565028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Highest Cited Papers in Brucellosis: Identification Using Two Databases and Review of the Papers' Major Findings.
Bakri FG; AlQadiri HM; Adwan MH
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():9291326. PubMed ID: 29850587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A list of highly influential biomedical researchers, 1996-2011.
Boyack KW; Klavans R; Sorensen AA; Ioannidis JP
Eur J Clin Invest; 2013 Dec; 43(12):1339-65. PubMed ID: 24134636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientometric evaluation of highly cited scientists in the field of forensic science and legal medicine.
Jones AW
Int J Legal Med; 2021 Mar; 135(2):701-707. PubMed ID: 33386980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of Orthopaedic Research Produced During the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Balazs GC; Dickens JF; Brelin AM; Wolfe JA; Rue JP; Potter BK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2777-84. PubMed ID: 25758377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Citation Analysis of the Korean Journal of Urology From Web of Science, Scopus, Korean Medical Citation Index, KoreaMed Synapse, and Google Scholar.
Huh S
Korean J Urol; 2013 Apr; 54(4):220-8. PubMed ID: 23614057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Which articles and which topics in the forensic sciences are most highly cited?
Jones AW
Sci Justice; 2005; 45(4):175-82. PubMed ID: 16686268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Google Scholar and the h-index in biomedicine: the popularization of bibliometric assessment].
Cabezas-Clavijo A; Delgado-López-Cózar E
Med Intensiva; 2013; 37(5):343-54. PubMed ID: 23517697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do bibliometric findings differ between Medline, Google Scholar and Web of Science? Bibliometry of publications after oral presentation to the 2013 and 2014 French Society of Arthroscopy (SFA) Congresses.
Villatte G; Marcheix PS; Antoni M; Devos P; Descamps S; Boisgard S; Erivan R
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 106(8):1469-1473. PubMed ID: 33153959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing.
De Groote SL; Raszewski R
Nurs Outlook; 2012; 60(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 22748758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact factor of a journal is a poor measure of the clinical relevance of its papers.
Kodumuri P; Ollivere B; Holley J; Moran CG
Bone Joint J; 2014 Mar; 96-B(3):414-9. PubMed ID: 24589801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
