These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27578357)

  • 1. A systematic approach to designing statistically powerful heteroscedastic 2 × 2 factorial studies while minimizing financial costs.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):114. PubMed ID: 27578357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal sample size allocation for Welch's test in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA.
    Shieh G; Jan SL
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Jun; 47(2):374-83. PubMed ID: 24903689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal contrast analysis with heterogeneous variances and budget concerns.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214391. PubMed ID: 30913244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal sample sizes for Welch's test under various allocation and cost considerations.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Dec; 43(4):1014-22. PubMed ID: 21512873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size determinations for Welch's test in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Feb; 67(1):72-93. PubMed ID: 23316952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factorial designs: a graphical aid for choosing study designs accounting for interaction.
    Byth K; Gebski V
    Clin Trials; 2004; 1(3):315-25. PubMed ID: 16279257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exact Power and Sample Size Calculations for the Two One-Sided Tests of Equivalence.
    Shieh G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162093. PubMed ID: 27598468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size determination for examining interaction effects in factorial designs under variance heterogeneity.
    Shieh G
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Mar; 23(1):113-124. PubMed ID: 28493739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The power of approximate degrees of freedom tests in heteroscedastic factorial designs.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Sep; 47(3):871-83. PubMed ID: 25123908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power and Sample Size Calculations for Contrast Analysis in ANCOVA.
    Shieh G
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 28121163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size calculations for model validation in linear regression analysis.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):54. PubMed ID: 30866825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal sample sizes for the design of reliability studies: power consideration.
    Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Sep; 46(3):772-85. PubMed ID: 24197712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Including sampling and phenotyping costs into the optimization of two stage designs for genomewide association studies.
    Müller HH; Pahl R; Schäfer H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):844-52. PubMed ID: 17549751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confidence intervals and sample size calculations for the weighted eta-squared effect sizes in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA.
    Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 22806705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size calculation in cost-effectiveness cluster randomized trials: optimal and maximin approaches.
    Manju MA; Candel MJ; Berger MP
    Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(15):2538-53. PubMed ID: 25019136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of alternative approaches for difference, noninferiority, and equivalence testing of normal percentiles.
    Shieh G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):59. PubMed ID: 32169043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size planning for the noninferiority or equivalence of a linear contrast with cost considerations.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):13-34. PubMed ID: 26121080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing two variances for superiority/non-inferiority and equivalence: Using the exhaustion algorithm for sample size allocation with cost.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 May; 73(2):316-332. PubMed ID: 31190402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative appraisal of two equivalence tests for multiple standardized effects.
    Shieh G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 126():110-7. PubMed ID: 26777779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power and sample size calculations for comparison of two regression lines with heterogeneous variances.
    Shieh G
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0207745. PubMed ID: 30557387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.