219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27578615)
1. Identifying significant gene-environment interactions using a combination of screening testing and hierarchical false discovery rate control.
Frost HR; Shen L; Saykin AJ; Williams SM; Moore JH;
Genet Epidemiol; 2016 Nov; 40(7):544-557. PubMed ID: 27578615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A screening-testing approach for detecting gene-environment interactions using sequential penalized and unpenalized multiple logistic regression.
Frost HR; Andrew AS; Karagas MR; Moore JH
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2015; ():183-94. PubMed ID: 25592580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of gene-environment interactions in the presence of linkage disequilibrium and noise by using genetic risk scores with internal weights from elastic net regression.
Hüls A; Ickstadt K; Schikowski T; Krämer U
BMC Genet; 2017 Jun; 18(1):55. PubMed ID: 28606108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A global test for gene-gene interactions based on random matrix theory.
Frost HR; Amos CI; Moore JH
Genet Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 40(8):689-701. PubMed ID: 27386793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved two-step testing of genome-wide gene-environment interactions.
Kawaguchi ES; Kim AE; Lewinger JP; Gauderman WJ
Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Mar; 47(2):152-166. PubMed ID: 36571162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance and robustness of penalized and unpenalized methods for genetic prediction of complex human disease.
Abraham G; Kowalczyk A; Zobel J; Inouye M
Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Feb; 37(2):184-95. PubMed ID: 23203348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detecting genetic association through shortest paths in a bidirected graph.
Ueki M; Kawasaki Y; Tamiya G;
Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 41(6):481-497. PubMed ID: 28626864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Penalized multimarker vs. single-marker regression methods for genome-wide association studies of quantitative traits.
Yi H; Breheny P; Imam N; Liu Y; Hoeschele I
Genetics; 2015 Jan; 199(1):205-22. PubMed ID: 25354699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparisons of power of statistical methods for gene-environment interaction analyses.
Ege MJ; Strachan DP
Eur J Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 28(10):785-97. PubMed ID: 24005774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A combination test for detection of gene-environment interaction in cohort studies.
Coombes B; Basu S; McGue M
Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 41(5):396-412. PubMed ID: 28370330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. GWASinlps: non-local prior based iterative SNP selection tool for genome-wide association studies.
Sanyal N; Lo MT; Kauppi K; Djurovic S; Andreassen OA; Johnson VE; Chen CH
Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 35(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 29931045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Re-assessment of multiple testing strategies for more efficient genome-wide association studies.
Otani T; Noma H; Nishino J; Matsui S
Eur J Hum Genet; 2018 Jul; 26(7):1038-1048. PubMed ID: 29523830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. METAINTER: meta-analysis of multiple regression models in genome-wide association studies.
Vaitsiakhovich T; Drichel D; Herold C; Lacour A; Becker T
Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 25252781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A robust and adaptive framework for interaction testing in quantitative traits between multiple genetic loci and exposure variables.
Hecker J; Prokopenko D; Moll M; Lee S; Kim W; Qiao D; Voorhies K; Kim W; Vansteelandt S; Hobbs BD; Cho MH; Silverman EK; Lutz SM; DeMeo DL; Weiss ST; Lange C
PLoS Genet; 2022 Nov; 18(11):e1010464. PubMed ID: 36383614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploiting Linkage Disequilibrium for Ultrahigh-Dimensional Genome-Wide Data with an Integrated Statistical Approach.
Carlsen M; Fu G; Bushman S; Corcoran C
Genetics; 2016 Feb; 202(2):411-26. PubMed ID: 26661113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploration of empirical Bayes hierarchical modeling for the analysis of genome-wide association study data.
Heron EA; O'Dushlaine C; Segurado R; Gallagher L; Gill M
Biostatistics; 2011 Jul; 12(3):445-61. PubMed ID: 21252078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hidden Markov models for controlling false discovery rate in genome-wide association analysis.
Wei Z
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 802():337-44. PubMed ID: 22130891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Test for interactions between a genetic marker set and environment in generalized linear models.
Lin X; Lee S; Christiani DC; Lin X
Biostatistics; 2013 Sep; 14(4):667-81. PubMed ID: 23462021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detecting Gene-Environment Interactions for a Quantitative Trait in a Genome-Wide Association Study.
Zhang P; Lewinger JP; Conti D; Morrison JL; Gauderman WJ
Genet Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 40(5):394-403. PubMed ID: 27230133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using Bayes model averaging to leverage both gene main effects and G × E interactions to identify genomic regions in genome-wide association studies.
Moss LC; Gauderman WJ; Lewinger JP; Conti DV
Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 43(2):150-165. PubMed ID: 30456811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
