208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27578627)
1. Floral scent of Joshua trees (Yucca brevifolia sensu lato): Divergence in scent profiles between species but breakdown of signal integrity in a narrow hybrid zone.
Svensson GP; Raguso RA; Flatz R; Smith CI
Am J Bot; 2016 Oct; 103(10):1793-1802. PubMed ID: 27578627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Asymmetric hybridization and gene flow between Joshua trees (Agavaceae: Yucca) reflect differences in pollinator host specificity.
Starr TN; Gadek KE; Yoder JB; Flatz R; Smith CI
Mol Ecol; 2013 Jan; 22(2):437-49. PubMed ID: 23190404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Host specificity and reproductive success of yucca moths (Tegeticula spp. Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae) mirror patterns of gene flow between host plant varieties of the Joshua tree (Yucca brevifolia: Agavaceae).
Smith CI; Drummond CS; Godsoe W; Yoder JB; Pellmyr O
Mol Ecol; 2009 Dec; 18(24):5218-29. PubMed ID: 19919591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of gene flow on phenotype matching between two varieties of Joshua tree (Yucca brevifolia; Agavaceae) and their pollinators.
Yoder JB; Smith CI; Rowley DJ; Flatz R; Godsoe W; Drummond C; Pellmyr O
J Evol Biol; 2013 Jun; 26(6):1220-33. PubMed ID: 23516990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coevolution and divergence in the Joshua tree/yucca moth mutualism.
Godsoe W; Yoder JB; Smith CI; Pellmyr O
Am Nat; 2008 Jun; 171(6):816-23. PubMed ID: 18462130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Population genomics of divergence within an obligate pollination mutualism: Selection maintains differences between Joshua tree species.
Royer AM; Streisfeld MA; Smith CI
Am J Bot; 2016 Oct; 103(10):1730-1741. PubMed ID: 27671531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First Recorded Observations of Pollination and Oviposition Behavior in
Cole WS; James AS; Smith CI
Ann Entomol Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 110(4):390-397. PubMed ID: 29563644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strong Selection Against Early Generation Hybrids in Joshua Tree Hybrid Zone Not Explained by Pollinators Alone.
Royer AM; Waite-Himmelwright J; Smith CI
Front Plant Sci; 2020; 11():640. PubMed ID: 32528500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strong conservation of floral scent composition in two allopatric yuccas.
Svensson GP; Pellmyr O; Raguso RA
J Chem Ecol; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2657-65. PubMed ID: 17131186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evolution and diversity of floral scent chemistry in the euglossine bee-pollinated orchid genus Gongora.
Hetherington-Rauth MC; Ramírez SR
Ann Bot; 2016 Jul; 118(1):135-48. PubMed ID: 27240855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genome-scale data resolves the timing of divergence in Joshua trees.
Smith CI; McKain MR; Guimond A; Flatz R
Am J Bot; 2021 Apr; 108(4):647-663. PubMed ID: 33846972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Floral scent in natural hybrids of Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) and their parental species.
Bischoff M; Jürgens A; Campbell DR
Ann Bot; 2014 Feb; 113(3):533-44. PubMed ID: 24355404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chemistry and geographic variation of floral scent in Yucca filamentosa (Agavaceae).
Svensson GP; Hickman MO; Bartram S; Boland W; Pellmyr O; Raguso RA
Am J Bot; 2005 Oct; 92(10):1624-31. PubMed ID: 21646079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Floral scent divergence across an elevational hybrid zone with varying pollinators.
García Y; Ostevik KL; Anderson J; Rausher MD; Parachnowitsch AL
Oecologia; 2023 Jan; 201(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 36374316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tetranorsesquiterpenoids as Attractants of Yucca Moths to Yucca Flowers.
Tröger A; Svensson GP; Galbrecht HM; Twele R; Patt JM; Bartram S; Zarbin PHG; Segraves KA; Althoff DM; von Reuss S; Raguso RA; Francke W
J Chem Ecol; 2021 Dec; 47(12):1025-1041. PubMed ID: 34506004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pollinator choice in Petunia depends on two major genetic Loci for floral scent production.
Klahre U; Gurba A; Hermann K; Saxenhofer M; Bossolini E; Guerin PM; Kuhlemeier C
Curr Biol; 2011 May; 21(9):730-9. PubMed ID: 21497087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of pollinator-inflicted ovule damage on floral abscission in the yucca-yucca moth mutualism: the role of mechanical and chemical factors.
Marr DL; Pellmyr O
Oecologia; 2003 Jul; 136(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 12756527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extreme divergence in floral scent among woodland star species (Lithophragma spp.) pollinated by floral parasites.
Friberg M; Schwind C; Raguso RA; Thompson JN
Ann Bot; 2013 Apr; 111(4):539-50. PubMed ID: 23365407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distinguishing coevolution from covicariance in an obligate pollination mutualism: asynchronous divergence in Joshua tree and its pollinators.
Smith CI; Godsoe WK; Tank S; Yoder JB; Pellmyr O
Evolution; 2008 Oct; 62(10):2676-87. PubMed ID: 18752609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nutrient availability affects floral scent much less than other floral and vegetative traits in Lithophragma bolanderi.
Friberg M; Waters MT; Thompson JN
Ann Bot; 2017 Sep; 120(3):471-478. PubMed ID: 28655187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
