These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27578870)

  • 1. Extracting multistage screening rules from online dating activity data.
    Bruch E; Feinberg F; Lee KY
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Sep; 113(38):10530-5. PubMed ID: 27578870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
    Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aspirational pursuit of mates in online dating markets.
    Bruch EE; Newman MEJ
    Sci Adv; 2018 Aug; 4(8):eaap9815. PubMed ID: 30101188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collective decision making by rational individuals.
    Mann RP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Oct; 115(44):E10387-E10396. PubMed ID: 30322917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What do women's advertised mate preferences reveal? An analysis of video dating profiles.
    Goetz CD
    Evol Psychol; 2013 May; 11(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 23718946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preference Versus Choice in Online Dating.
    Whyte S; Torgler B
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2017 Mar; 20(3):150-156. PubMed ID: 28263677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational mate choice: theory and empirical evidence.
    Castellano S; Cadeddu G; Cermelli P
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jun; 90(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 22410366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Positives and negatives of online dating according to women 50.
    Vandeweerd C; Myers J; Coulter M; Yalcin A; Corvin J
    J Women Aging; 2016; 28(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 27191792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mapping collective behavior in the big-data era.
    Bentley RA; O'Brien MJ; Brock WA
    Behav Brain Sci; 2014 Feb; 37(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 24572217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Big two personality and big three mate preferences: similarity attracts, but country-level mate preferences crucially matter.
    Gebauer JE; Leary MR; Neberich W
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Dec; 38(12):1579-93. PubMed ID: 22956293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mate choice decisions: the role of facial beauty.
    Johnston VS
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jan; 10(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 16311066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. More options lead to more searching and worse choices in finding partners for romantic relationships online: an experimental study.
    Wu PL; Chiou WB
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2009 Jun; 12(3):315-8. PubMed ID: 19250015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time pressure and the application of decision rules: choices and judgments among multiattribute alternatives.
    Edland A
    Scand J Psychol; 1994 Sep; 35(3):281-91. PubMed ID: 7939490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Through evolution's eyes: extracting mate preferences by linking visual attention to adaptive design.
    Krupp DB
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Feb; 37(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 18157626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Compensatory and Noncompensatory Strategies in Risky Choice.
    Van Duijvenvoorde AC; Figner B; Weeda WD; Van der Molen MW; Jansen BR; Huizenga HM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 28(9):1358-73. PubMed ID: 27167399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategy selection in decisions from givens: Deciding at a glance?
    Pachur T
    Cogn Psychol; 2022 Aug; 136():101483. PubMed ID: 35640353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of herd cues and product involvement on bidder online choices.
    Chen YF; Wang YJ
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2010 Aug; 13(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 20712500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dating and commitment choices as a function of ethnicity among American college students in California.
    Fiebert MS; Nugent D; Hershberger SL; Kasdan M
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Jun; 94(3 Pt 2):1293-300. PubMed ID: 15362407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The causal psycho-logic of choice.
    Sloman SA; Hagmayer Y
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Sep; 10(9):407-12. PubMed ID: 16899398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Online dating apps help unearth undiagnosed HIV cases.
    Nurs Stand; 2016 Jun; 30(42):16. PubMed ID: 27305231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.