146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27579512)
1. Dietary Toxicity Thresholds and Ecological Risks for Birds and Mammals Based on Species Sensitivity Distributions.
Korsman JC; Schipper AM; Hendriks AJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Oct; 50(19):10644-10652. PubMed ID: 27579512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can We Reasonably Predict Chronic Species Sensitivity Distributions from Acute Species Sensitivity Distributions?
Hiki K; Iwasaki Y
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Oct; 54(20):13131-13136. PubMed ID: 32924457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Augmenting aquatic species sensitivity distributions with interspecies toxicity estimation models.
Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Jackson CR; Barron MG
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Mar; 33(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 24214839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can Chemical Toxicity in Saltwater Be Predicted from Toxicity in Freshwater? A Comprehensive Evaluation Using Species Sensitivity Distributions.
Yanagihara M; Hiki K; Iwasaki Y
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Aug; 41(8):2021-2027. PubMed ID: 35502940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of fish, birds and mammals as surrogates for amphibians and reptiles in pesticide toxicity assessment.
Ortiz-Santaliestra ME; Maia JP; Egea-Serrano A; Lopes I
Ecotoxicology; 2018 Sep; 27(7):819-833. PubMed ID: 29492806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relative sensitivity of freshwater species to antimony(III): Implications for water quality guidelines and ecological risk assessments.
Obiakor MO; Tighe M; Wang Z; Ezeonyejiaku CD; Pereg L; Wilson SC
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Nov; 24(32):25276-25290. PubMed ID: 28929352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Protectiveness of species sensitivity distribution hazard concentrations for acute toxicity used in endangered species risk assessment.
Raimondo S; Vivian DN; Delos C; Barron MG
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2008 Dec; 27(12):2599-607. PubMed ID: 18699704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Aquatic ecological risk assessment of microcystins and nitrogen pollution based on species sensitivity distribution].
Chen J; Liu YM; Zhang JY
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2014 Apr; 25(4):1171-80. PubMed ID: 25011315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interspecies correlation estimates predict protective environmental concentrations.
Dyer SD; Versteeg DJ; Belanger SE; Chaney JG; Mayer FL
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 May; 40(9):3102-11. PubMed ID: 16719118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of species sensitivity distributions derived from interspecies correlation models to distributions used to derive water quality criteria.
Dyer SD; Versteeg DJ; Belanger SE; Chaney JG; Raimondo S; Barron MG
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Apr; 42(8):3076-83. PubMed ID: 18497169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shellfish and residual chemical contaminants: hazards, monitoring, and health risk assessment along French coasts.
Guéguen M; Amiard JC; Arnich N; Badot PM; Claisse D; Guérin T; Vernoux JP
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011; 213():55-111. PubMed ID: 21541848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exposure pattern-specific species sensitivity distributions for the ecological risk assessments of insecticides.
Van den Brink PJ; Buijert-de Gelder DM; Brock TCM; Roessink I; Focks A
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Sep; 180():252-258. PubMed ID: 31096128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Derivation of freshwater quality criteria for zinc using interspecies correlation estimation models to protect aquatic life in China.
Feng CL; Wu FC; Dyer SD; Chang H; Zhao XL
Chemosphere; 2013 Jan; 90(3):1177-83. PubMed ID: 23058200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the Species Sensitivity Distribution Approach to Derive Ecological Threshold of Toxicological Concern (eco-TTC) for Pesticides.
Rizzi C; Villa S; Cuzzeri AS; Finizio A
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(22):. PubMed ID: 34831835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aquatic acute species sensitivity distributions of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles.
Adam N; Schmitt C; De Bruyn L; Knapen D; Blust R
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Sep; 526():233-42. PubMed ID: 25933293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures.
Belanger S; Barron M; Craig P; Dyer S; Galay-Burgos M; Hamer M; Marshall S; Posthuma L; Raimondo S; Whitehouse P
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):664-674. PubMed ID: 27531323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Setting water quality criteria in China: approaches for developing species sensitivity distributions for metals and metalloids.
Liu Y; Wu F; Mu Y; Feng C; Fang Y; Chen L; Giesy JP
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014; 230():35-57. PubMed ID: 24609517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deriving Field-Based Ecological Risks for Bird Species.
Hoondert RPJ; Hilbers JP; Hendriks AJ; Huijbregts MAJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Mar; 52(6):3716-3726. PubMed ID: 29484892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of species sensitivity distribution modeling approaches for environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials - A case study for silver and titanium dioxide representative materials.
Sørensen SN; Wigger H; Zabeo A; Semenzin E; Hristozov D; Nowack B; Spurgeon DJ; Baun A
Aquat Toxicol; 2020 Aug; 225():105543. PubMed ID: 32585540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of species sensitivity distributions for wildlife using interspecies toxicity correlation models.
Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Barron MG
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 May; 42(9):3447-52. PubMed ID: 18522132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
