146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27579512)
21. Toxicity reference values for polybrominated diphenyl ethers: risk assessment for predatory birds and mammals from two Chinese lakes.
Zhang R; Guo J; Wu F; Mu Y; Giesy JP; Chang H; Zhao X; Feng C
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014; 229():111-37. PubMed ID: 24515812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Advancing Fifth Percentile Hazard Concentration Estimation Using Toxicity-Normalized Species Sensitivity Distributions.
Dhond AK; Barron MG
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Dec; 56(23):17188-17196. PubMed ID: 36410104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Environmental benchmarks based on ecotoxicological assessment with planktonic species might not adequately protect benthic assemblages in lotic systems.
Vidal T; Santos JI; Queirós L; Ré A; Abrantes N; Gonçalves FJM; Pereira JL
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 668():1289-1297. PubMed ID: 31018468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ecological hazard assessment of dioxins: hazards to organisms at different levels of aquatic food webs (fish-eating birds and mammals, fish and invertebrates).
Loonen H; van de Guchte C; Parsons JR; de Voogt P; Govers HA
Sci Total Environ; 1996 Apr; 182(1-3):93-103. PubMed ID: 8854941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Do predictions from Species Sensitivity Distributions match with field data?
Smetanová S; Bláha L; Liess M; Schäfer RB; Beketov MA
Environ Pollut; 2014 Jun; 189():126-33. PubMed ID: 24657606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The difference between temperate and tropical saltwater species' acute sensitivity to chemicals is relatively small.
Wang Z; Kwok KW; Lui GC; Zhou GJ; Lee JS; Lam MH; Leung KM
Chemosphere; 2014 Jun; 105():31-43. PubMed ID: 24289976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. One uncertainty factor does not fit all: Identifying mode of action and species specific acute to chronic ratios for aquatic life.
Wang Z; Berninger JP; You J; Brooks BW
Environ Pollut; 2020 Jul; 262():114262. PubMed ID: 32120260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Eco-epidemiology of aquatic ecosystems: Separating chemicals from multiple stressors.
Posthuma L; Dyer SD; de Zwart D; Kapo K; Holmes CM; Burton GA
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Dec; 573():1303-1319. PubMed ID: 27519323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Estimating population-level HC5 for copper using a species sensitivity distribution approach.
Iwasaki Y; Hayashi TI; Kamo M
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Jun; 32(6):1396-402. PubMed ID: 23417717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Which distribution to choose for deriving a species sensitivity distribution? Implications from analysis of acute and chronic ecotoxicity data.
Yanagihara M; Hiki K; Iwasaki Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2024 Jun; 278():116379. PubMed ID: 38714082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mean Species Abundance as a Measure of Ecotoxicological Risk.
Hoeks S; Huijbregts MAJ; Douziech M; Hendriks AJ; Oldenkamp R
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Nov; 39(11):2304-2313. PubMed ID: 32786097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing aquatic risk assessment methods for the photosynthesis-inhibiting herbicides metribuzin and metamitron.
Brock TC; Crum SJ; Deneer JW; Heimbach F; Roijackers RM; Sinkeldam JA
Environ Pollut; 2004 Aug; 130(3):403-26. PubMed ID: 15182972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Risk assessment of episodic exposures to chemicals should consider both the physiological and the ecological sensitivities of species.
Kefford BJ; Liess M; Warne MS; Metzeling L; Schäfer RB
Sci Total Environ; 2012 Dec; 441():213-9. PubMed ID: 23137987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Aquatic risk assessment of alcohol ethoxylates in North America and Europe.
Belanger SE; Dorn PB; Toy R; Boeije G; Marshall SJ; Wind T; Van Compernolle R; Zeller D
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2006 May; 64(1):85-99. PubMed ID: 16439022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of specific versus literature species sensitivity distributions for herbicides risk assessment.
Larras F; Gregorio V; Bouchez A; Montuelle B; Chèvre N
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Feb; 23(4):3042-52. PubMed ID: 26396014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A re-evaluation of fifteen years of European risk assessment using effect models.
De Laender F; Van Sprang P; Janssen CR
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Mar; 32(3):594-601. PubMed ID: 23239137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Revisiting assessment factors for species sensitivity distributions as a function of sample size and variation in species sensitivity.
Kamo M; Hayashi TI; Iwasaki Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2022 Nov; 246():114170. PubMed ID: 36242822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Estimation of herbicide species sensitivity distribution using single-species algal toxicity data and information on the mode of action.
Nagai T; Taya K
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Mar; 34(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 25475367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of in silico development of aquatic toxicity species sensitivity distributions.
Barron MG; Jackson CR; Awkerman JA
Aquat Toxicol; 2012 Jul; 116-117():1-7. PubMed ID: 22459408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. SSDs revisited: part II-practical considerations in the development and use of application factors applied to species sensitivity distributions.
Belanger SE; Carr GJ
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Jul; 38(7):1526-1541. PubMed ID: 30994956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
