These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27579601)

  • 21. Patient Opinion on the Affordable Care Act in an Otolaryngology Practice: the Ideological Divide.
    Hiebert JC; Rhodes RM; Anderson MP; Vasan NR
    J Okla State Med Assoc; 2016 Sep; 109(9):441-5. PubMed ID: 29280606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Parents' views on sex education in schools: How much do Democrats and Republicans agree?
    Kantor L; Levitz N
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180250. PubMed ID: 28672027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Partisan differences in the relationship between newspaper coverage and concern over global warming.
    Zhao X; Rolfe-Redding J; Kotcher JE
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jul; 25(5):543-59. PubMed ID: 25468002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Disability in two health care systems: access, quality, satisfaction, and physician contacts among working-age Canadians and Americans with disabilities.
    Gulley SP; Altman BM
    Disabil Health J; 2008 Oct; 1(4):196-208. PubMed ID: 21122730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Connections between viewing media about President Trump's dietary habits and fast food consumption intentions: Political differences and implications for public health.
    Myrick JG
    Appetite; 2020 Apr; 147():104545. PubMed ID: 31794820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Back on the center stage. Republicans' losses in Congress cause speculation among industry insiders on changes in lawmakers' healthcare agendas.
    DoBias M; Lubell J
    Mod Healthc; 2006 Nov; 36(45):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 17153352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. When the tables are turned: The effects of the 2016 U.S. Presidential election on in-group favoritism and out-group hostility.
    Oc B; Moore C; Bashshur MR
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197848. PubMed ID: 29795642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Public attitudes toward biofuels. Effects of knowledge, political partisanship, and media use.
    Cacciatore MA; Binder AR; Scheufele DA; Shaw BR
    Politics Life Sci; 2012; 31(1-2):36-51. PubMed ID: 23379314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Moral-Language Use by U.S. Political Elites.
    Wang SN; Inbar Y
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Jan; 32(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 33306432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influencing Republicans' and Democrats' attitudes toward Obamacare: Effects of imagined vicarious cognitive dissonance on political attitudes.
    Cooper J; Feldman LA; Blackman SF
    J Soc Psychol; 2019; 159(1):112-117. PubMed ID: 29659334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Democrats and republicans can be differentiated from their faces.
    Rule NO; Ambady N
    PLoS One; 2010 Jan; 5(1):e8733. PubMed ID: 20090906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Opposing views: associations of political polarization, political party affiliation, and social trust with COVID-19 vaccination intent and receipt.
    Dolman AJ; Fraser T; Panagopoulos C; Aldrich DP; Kim D
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2023 Mar; 45(1):36-39. PubMed ID: 35077546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Of pathogens and party lines: Social conservatism positively associates with COVID-19 precautions among U.S. Democrats but not Republicans.
    Samore T; Fessler DMT; Sparks AM; Holbrook C
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253326. PubMed ID: 34185786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Presidents and health reform: from Franklin D. Roosevelt to Barack Obama.
    Morone JA
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Jun; 29(6):1096-100. PubMed ID: 20530336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: trusted information sources shape public thinking.
    Malka A; Krosnick JA; Langer G
    Risk Anal; 2009 May; 29(5):633-47. PubMed ID: 19302280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. More Polarized but More Independent: Political Party Identification and Ideological Self-Categorization Among U.S. Adults, College Students, and Late Adolescents, 1970-2015.
    Twenge JM; Honeycutt N; Prislin R; Sherman RA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1364-83. PubMed ID: 27604353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An Online experiment during the 2020 US-Iran crisis shows that exposure to common enemies can increase political polarization.
    Jahani E; Gallagher N; Merhout F; Cavalli N; Guilbeault D; Leng Y; Bail CA
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19304. PubMed ID: 36369344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans' support for partisan violence.
    Mernyk JS; Pink SL; Druckman JN; Willer R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Apr; 119(16):e2116851119. PubMed ID: 35412915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Presidential politics: health care & the Holy Grail.
    Sorian R
    J Am Health Policy; 1991; 1(2):26-33. PubMed ID: 10112728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Partisan differences in the effects of economic evidence and local data on legislator engagement with dissemination materials about behavioral health: a dissemination trial.
    Purtle J; Nelson KL; Gebrekristos L; Lê-Scherban F; Gollust SE
    Implement Sci; 2022 Jun; 17(1):38. PubMed ID: 35729630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.