These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27579839)

  • 1. Cochlear Size and Shape Variability and Implications in Cochlear Implantation Surgery.
    Meng J; Li S; Zhang F; Li Q; Qin Z
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):1307-13. PubMed ID: 27579839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear coiling pattern and orientation differences in cochlear implant candidates.
    Martinez-Monedero R; Niparko JK; Aygun N
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1086-93. PubMed ID: 21817935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.
    Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hassepass F; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Beck R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical anatomy of the basal turn of the human cochlea as pertaining to cochlear implantation.
    Singla A; Sahni D; Gupta AK; Aggarwal A; Gupta T
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):323-8. PubMed ID: 24770412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variational anatomy of the human cochlea: implications for cochlear implantation.
    Erixon E; Högstorp H; Wadin K; Rask-Andersen H
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 18833017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of Insertion Models Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Position.
    van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Wolterbeek R; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 26760199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal electrode length to match patient specific cochlear anatomy.
    Mistrík P; Jolly C
    Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2016 Jun; 133 Suppl 1():S68-71. PubMed ID: 27246743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic Cochlear Duct Length Estimation for Selection of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays.
    Rivas A; Cakir A; Hunter JB; Labadie RF; Zuniga MG; Wanna GB; Dawant BM; Noble JH
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Mar; 38(3):339-346. PubMed ID: 28146009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to predict cochlear length before cochlear implantation surgery.
    Erixon E; Rask-Andersen H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Dec; 133(12):1258-65. PubMed ID: 24053486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Atraumaticity study of 2 cochlear implant electrode arrays.
    Manrique M; Picciafuoco S; Manrique R; Sanhueza I; Domínguez P; Pérez N; Zubieta JL; de Abajo J
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Apr; 35(4):619-28. PubMed ID: 24569795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shape of the Cochlear Basal Turn: An Indicator for an Optimal
    Khurayzi T; Dhanasingh A; Almuhawas F; Alsanosi A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2021 Jan; 100(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 32330070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear Implantation: Small Cochlear Diameter May Indicate Degree of Abnormality.
    Altamimi FN; Fatemah A; Al-Amro M; Al Montasher A; Al Otaibi S; Al Muhawas F
    J Int Adv Otol; 2024 Mar; 20(2):108-112. PubMed ID: 39155857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Insertion depth angles of cochlear implant arrays with varying length: a temporal bone study.
    Franke-Trieger A; Jolly C; Darbinjan A; Zahnert T; Mürbe D
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jan; 35(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 24335932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Method to estimate the basal turn length in inner ear malformation types.
    Alshalan A; Almuhawas F; Alhabib S; Hamed N; Abdelsamad Y; Dhanasingh A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):66. PubMed ID: 36604454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anatomical Variations of the Human Cochlea Determined from Micro-CT and High-Resolution CT Imaging and Reconstruction.
    Tang J; Tang X; Li Z; Liu Y; Tan S; Li H; Ke R; Wang Z; Gong L; Tang A
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2018 Jun; 301(6):1086-1095. PubMed ID: 29160929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The size of the cochlea and predictions of insertion depth angles for cochlear implant electrodes.
    Escudé B; James C; Deguine O; Cochard N; Eter E; Fraysse B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():27-33. PubMed ID: 17063008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-resolution computed tomography-based length assessments of the cochlea--an accuracy evaluation.
    Kisser U; Ertl-Wagner B; Hempel JM; Müller J; D'Anastasi M; Schrötzlmair F; Adderson-Kisser C; Laubender RP; Stelter K; Braun C; Pomschar A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Oct; 134(10):1011-5. PubMed ID: 25220722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diversity in cochlear morphology and its influence on cochlear implant electrode position.
    van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Wolterbeek R; Snel-Bongers J; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e9-20. PubMed ID: 24196418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation Between Cochlear Length, Insertion Angle, and Tonotopic Mismatch for MED-EL FLEX28 Electrode Arrays.
    Dutrieux N; Quatre R; Péan V; Schmerber S
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jan; 43(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 34538852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo measurements of the insertion depth of cochlear implant arrays using flat-panel volume computed tomography.
    Trieger A; Schulze A; Schneider M; Zahnert T; Mürbe D
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jan; 32(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 20962701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.