BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27579987)

  • 1. Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Stakhovskaya OA; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):e22-e38. PubMed ID: 27579987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bilateral Loudness Balancing and Distorted Spatial Perception in Recipients of Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Fitzgerald MB; Kan A; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):e225-36. PubMed ID: 25985017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
    Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
    Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Anderson SR; Easter K; Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Nov; 146(5):3232. PubMed ID: 31795662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.
    van Hoesel RJ; Tyler RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1617-30. PubMed ID: 12656396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of Microphone Placement on Interaural Level Differences and Sound Localization Across the Horizontal Plane in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jones HG; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):e341-5. PubMed ID: 27054512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lateralization of binaural envelope cues measured with a mobile cochlear-implant research processora).
    Dennison SR; Thakkar T; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jun; 153(6):3543-3558. PubMed ID: 37390320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.
    Zaleski-King A; Goupell MJ; Barac-Cikoja D; Bakke M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Sep; 30(8):659-671. PubMed ID: 30417825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user.
    Long CJ; Eddington DK; Colburn HS; Rabinowitz WM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1565-74. PubMed ID: 14514210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lateralization of interaural timing differences with multi-electrode stimulation in bilateral cochlear-implant users.
    Kan A; Jones HG; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Nov; 140(5):EL392. PubMed ID: 27908067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reweighting of Binaural Localization Cues in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Klingel M; Laback B
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Feb; 23(1):119-136. PubMed ID: 34812980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
    Ehlers E; Goupell MJ; Zheng Y; Godar SP; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4264. PubMed ID: 28618809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interaural Time-Difference Discrimination as a Measure of Place of Stimulation for Cochlear-Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.
    Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Schuchman GI; Jensen KK; Goupell MJ
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518765514. PubMed ID: 29623771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Channel Interaction and Current Level Affect Across-Electrode Integration of Interaural Time Differences in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Egger K; Majdak P; Laback B
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Feb; 17(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 26377826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Everyday Listening Performance of Children Before and After Receiving a Second Cochlear Implant: Results Using the Parent Version of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale.
    Galvin KL; Mok M
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 26418045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Channel Envelope Synchrony on Interaural Time Difference Sensitivity in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Francart T; Lenssen A; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):e199-206. PubMed ID: 25738574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suitability of the Binaural Interaction Component for Interaural Electrode Pairing of Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Kollmeier B; Dietz M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():57-64. PubMed ID: 27080646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
    Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.