110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27580116)
1. Evaluation of the effects of anatomic location, histologic processing, and sample size on shrinkage of skin samples obtained from canine cadavers.
Reagan JK; Selmic LE; Garrett LD; Singh K
Am J Vet Res; 2016 Sep; 77(9):1036-44. PubMed ID: 27580116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of histologic processing on dimensions of skin samples obtained from cat cadavers.
Jeyakumar S; Smith AN; Schleis SE; Cattley RC; Tillson DM; Henderson RA
Am J Vet Res; 2015 Nov; 76(11):939-45. PubMed ID: 26512538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the effect of routine histologic processing on the size of skin samples obtained from dogs.
Reimer SB; Séguin B; DeCock HE; Walsh PJ; Kass PH
Am J Vet Res; 2005 Mar; 66(3):500-5. PubMed ID: 15822596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effect of Specimen Preparation on Post-Excision and Post-Fixation Dimensions, Translation, and Distortion of Canine Cadaver Skin-Muscle-Fascia Specimens.
Risselada M; Mathews KG; Griffith E
Vet Surg; 2016 Jul; 45(5):563-70. PubMed ID: 27199161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of sample site and size, skin tension lines, surgeon, and formalin fixation on shrinkage of skin samples excised from canine cadavers.
Upchurch DA; Malenfant RC; Wignall JR; Ogden DM; Saile K
Am J Vet Res; 2014 Nov; 75(11):1004-9. PubMed ID: 25350091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of feline skin specimen preparation on postexcision and postfixation tissue shrinkage.
Risselada M; Mathews KG; Griffith E
J Feline Med Surg; 2016 Dec; 18(12):970-975. PubMed ID: 26329723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shrinkage of skin excision specimens: formalin fixation is not the culprit.
Dauendorffer JN; Bastuji-Garin S; Guéro S; Brousse N; Fraitag S
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Apr; 160(4):810-4. PubMed ID: 19183182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of methods used to collect canine intestinal tissues for histologic examination.
Fenwick BW; Kruckenberg S
Am J Vet Res; 1987 Aug; 48(8):1276-81. PubMed ID: 3307563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Amount of skin shrinkage affecting tumor versus grossly normal marginal skin of dogs for cutaneous mast cell tumors excised with curative intent.
Upchurch DA; Klocke EE; Henningson JN
Am J Vet Res; 2018 Jul; 79(7):779-786. PubMed ID: 29943629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification of tissue shrinkage in canine small intestinal specimens after resection and fixation.
Clarke BS; Banks TA; Findji L
Can J Vet Res; 2014 Jan; 78(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 24396180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skin tumour specimen shrinkage with excision and formalin fixation-how much and why: a prospective study and discussion of the literature.
de Waal J
ANZ J Surg; 2021 Dec; 91(12):2744-2749. PubMed ID: 34459559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study of shrinkage of cutaneous surgical specimens.
Blasco-Morente G; Garrido-Colmenero C; Pérez-López I; Carretero-García S; Martín-Castro A; Arias-Santiago S; Tercedor-Sánchez J
J Cutan Pathol; 2015 Apr; 42(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 25355467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anatomic characterization of pulmonary accessory fissures in canine cadavers.
Mendoza P; Giglio RF; Olmo C; Abbott JR; Johnson RD; Berry CR
Anat Histol Embryol; 2019 Mar; 48(2):157-163. PubMed ID: 30657203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computed tomographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and cross-sectional anatomic features of the manus in cadavers of dogs without forelimb disease.
Ober CP; Freeman LE
Am J Vet Res; 2009 Dec; 70(12):1450-8. PubMed ID: 19951115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of HistoGel™-embedded specimens for use in veterinary diagnostic pathology.
Joiner KS; Spangler EA
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2012 Jul; 24(4):710-5. PubMed ID: 22585953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgically planned versus histologically measured lateral tumor margins for resection of cutaneous and subcutaneous mast cell tumors in dogs: 46 cases (2010-2013).
Risselada M; Mathews KG; Griffith E
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2015 Jul; 247(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 26133218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasonographic and anatomic study of the canine elbow joint.
Villamonte-Chevalier AA; Soler M; Sarria R; Agut A; Gielen I; Latorre R
Vet Surg; 2015 May; 44(4):485-93. PubMed ID: 25069857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shrinkage of cutaneous specimens: formalin or other factors involved?
Kerns MJ; Darst MA; Olsen TG; Fenster M; Hall P; Grevey S
J Cutan Pathol; 2008 Dec; 35(12):1093-6. PubMed ID: 18544064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cellular subcutaneous tissue. Anatomic observations].
Marquart-Elbaz C; Varnaison E; Sick H; Grosshans E; Cribier B
Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2001 Nov; 128(11):1207-13. PubMed ID: 11908164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomographic and cross-sectional anatomic characterization of myofascial compartments and soft tissue spaces in the manus in cadavers of dogs without forelimb disease.
Ober CP; Jones JC; Larson MM; Lanz OI
Am J Vet Res; 2010 Feb; 71(2):138-49. PubMed ID: 20113220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
