These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27582628)

  • 1. Efficacy of safety catheter devices in the prevention of occupational needlestick injuries: applied research in the Liguria Region (Italy).
    Sossai D; Di Guardo M; Foscoli R; Pezzi R; Polimeni A; Ruzza L; Miele M; Ottaggio L; Fontana V; Copello F; DellacĂ  P; Doria M; Onesti A; Montecucco G; Risso F; Nelli M; Benvenuti I; Santacroce M; Giribaldi L; Picelli G; Simonini S; Venturini P
    J Prev Med Hyg; 2016; 57(2):E110-4. PubMed ID: 27582628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Needlestick prevention devices: data from hospital surveillance in Piedmont, Italy-comprehensive analysis on needlestick injuries between healthcare workers after the introduction of safety devices.
    Ottino MC; Argentero A; Argentero PA; Garzaro G; Zotti CM
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e030576. PubMed ID: 31748292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.
    Lavoie MC; Verbeek JH; Pahwa M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD009740. PubMed ID: 24610008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.
    Reddy VK; Lavoie MC; Verbeek JH; Pahwa M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD009740. PubMed ID: 29190036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preventability of percutaneous injuries in healthcare workers: a year-long survey in Italy.
    Castella A; Vallino A; Argentero PA; Zotti CM
    J Hosp Infect; 2003 Dec; 55(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 14629973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using an intravenous catheter system to prevent needlestick injury.
    Sossai D; Puro V; Chiappatoli L; Dagnino G; Odone B; Polimeri A; Ruzza L; Palombo P; Fuscoe MS; Scognamiglio P
    Nurs Stand; 2010 Mar 24-30; 24(29):42-6. PubMed ID: 20426370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prevalence and prevention of needlestick injuries among health care workers in a German university hospital.
    Wicker S; Jung J; Allwinn R; Gottschalk R; Rabenau HF
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2008 Jan; 81(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 17619897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Device-specific risk of needlestick injury in Italian health care workers.
    Ippolito G; De Carli G; Puro V; Petrosillo N; Arici C; Bertucci R; Bianciardi L; Bonazzi L; Cestrone A; Daglio M
    JAMA; 1994 Aug 24-31; 272(8):607-10. PubMed ID: 8057516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of the introduction of an engineered sharps injury prevention device on the percutaneous injury rate in healthcare workers.
    Azar-Cavanagh M; Burdt P; Green-McKenzie J
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 28(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 17265397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?
    Orenstein R; Reynolds L; Karabaic M; Lamb A; Markowitz SM; Wong ES
    Am J Infect Control; 1995 Dec; 23(6):344-51. PubMed ID: 8821109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Needlestick injuries among health care workers: occupational hazard or avoidable hazard?
    Wicker S; Ludwig AM; Gottschalk R; Rabenau HF
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2008; 120(15-16):486-92. PubMed ID: 18820853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Needlestick injuries: the role of safety-engineered devices in prevention.
    Jackson AP; Almerol LA; Campbell J; Hamilton L
    Br J Nurs; 2020 Jul; 29(14):S22-S30. PubMed ID: 32697642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of a shielded safety syringe on needlestick injuries among healthcare workers.
    Younger B; Hunt EH; Robinson C; McLemore C
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1992 Jun; 13(6):349-53. PubMed ID: 1619272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Needlestick injuries and safety syringes: a review of the literature.
    Higginson R; Parry A
    Br J Nurs; 2013 Apr 25-May 8; 22(8):S4, S6-8, S10 passim. PubMed ID: 23752503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of safety-engineered devices by healthcare workers for intravenous and/or phlebotomy procedures in healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ballout RA; Diab B; Harb AC; Tarabay R; Khamassi S; Akl EA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Sep; 16():458. PubMed ID: 27581947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety syringes and anti-needlestick devices in orthopaedic surgery.
    Sibbitt WL; Band PA; Kettwich LG; Sibbitt CR; Sibbitt LJ; Bankhurst AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Sep; 93(17):1641-9. PubMed ID: 21915580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Safety-Engineered Devices.
    Fukuda H; Moriwaki K
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 37(9):1012-21. PubMed ID: 27226284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bloodborne pathogens: toward safer needles.
    Ellis T
    J Healthc Prot Manage; 1999; 15(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 10557438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing needlestick injuries through safety-engineered devices: results of a Japanese multi-centre study.
    Fukuda H; Yamanaka N
    J Hosp Infect; 2016 Feb; 92(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 26601603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review of needle-protective devices to prevent sharps injuries.
    Trim JC
    Br J Nurs; 2004 Feb 12-25; 13(3):144, 146-53. PubMed ID: 14997076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.