These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2758334)

  • 1. [Microcomputer-assisted system for photographing the movements of biological valve prostheses].
    Vrsanský D; Kiss A; Simkovic I
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 1989 May; 90(5):336-8. PubMed ID: 2758334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [In vitro comparison of properties of aortic allotransplants and the Björk-Shiley valve].
    Vrsanský D; Simkovic I
    Rozhl Chir; 1991 Feb; 70(1-2):60-3. PubMed ID: 1925786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro comparison between the hydrodynamic characteristics of the Hancock 250 (modified orifice) xenografts and the Björk-Shiley aortic valve prostheses.
    Wright JT
    Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs; 1977; 23():89-94. PubMed ID: 910416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Thirty years survival without anticoagulation after aortic valve replacement with a Björk-Shiley prosthesis.
    Kücükaksu DS; Akgül A; Uzun A; Tarcan O; Cagli K; Sener E; Tasdemir O; Bayazit K
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jul; 10(4):548-9. PubMed ID: 11499606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical valves: a comparative analysis of the Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley prostheses.
    Murphy DA; Levine FH; Buckley MJ; Swinski L; Daggett WM; Akins CW; Austen WG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Nov; 86(5):746-52. PubMed ID: 6632948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.
    Bloomfield P; Wheatley DJ; Prescott RJ; Miller HC
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Feb; 324(9):573-9. PubMed ID: 1992318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
    Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and St. Jude Medical heart valve replacement].
    Horstkotte D; Körfer R; Budde T; Haerten K; Schulte HD; Bircks W; Loogen F
    Z Kardiol; 1983 May; 72(5):251-61. PubMed ID: 6880335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Functional transvalvular regurgitation in patients with Björk-Shiley aortic valves: a pulsed Doppler echocardiographic study].
    Yoshida K; Yoshikawa J; Kato H; Yanagihara K; Okumachi F; Koizumi K; Shiratori K; Asaka T; Suzuki K; Inanami H
    J Cardiogr; 1985 Dec; 15(4):1137-44. PubMed ID: 3841896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Non-invasive determination of pressure gradients of heart valve prostheses using Doppler ultrasound].
    Hoffmann A; Amann FW; Grädel E; Burckhardt D
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1982 Nov; 112(45):1600-3. PubMed ID: 7156956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An examination of two retrieved long-term human implant Björk-Shiley valves.
    More RB
    Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(3-4):195-200. PubMed ID: 7877565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Malfunction of the Björk-Shiley valve prosthesis due to disc defacement--report of two cases of successful reoperation].
    Misumi H; Matsuo K; Ishihara K; Nakae S; Hashimoto A; Koyanagi H
    Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Mar; 37(3):522-8. PubMed ID: 2768926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A comparative study of replacement of the aortic valve by a homograft and by a Björk prosthesis (author's transl)].
    Mikaeloff P; Loire R; Fleurette J; Delarbre JF; Biron A
    Ann Chir Thorac Cardiovasc; 1977 Jan; 16(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 835995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Preparation and preservation of homologous and heterologous aortic valve transplants. Histological and clinical results].
    Stutte HJ; Bernhard A; Thiele F
    Zentralbl Chir; 1969 Jan; 94(2):33-45. PubMed ID: 5371271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Selection of valve prosthesis, reoperation and late result--surgical technique of reoperation with Björk-Shiley prosthesis].
    Sunamori M; Suzuki A
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Sep; 90(9):1517-20. PubMed ID: 2586456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer simulation: a diagnostic method in comparative studies of valve prostheses.
    Engelman MS; Moskowitz SE; Borman JB
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Mar; 79(3):402-12. PubMed ID: 7354636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pressure drop and velocity fields at four mechanical heart valve prostheses: Björk-Shiley Standard, Björk-Shiley Concave-Convex, Hall-Kaster and St. Jude Medical.
    Bruss KH; Reul H; van Gilse J; Knott E
    Life Support Syst; 1983; 1(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 6678369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Replacement of cardiac valves with Björk-Shiley and Cooley-Cutter prostheses: a comparative study (author's transl)].
    Chiariello L; Wukasch C; Cooley A
    G Ital Cardiol; 1977; 7(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 856658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Patient-adapted valve selection: biological vs. mechanical heart valve replacement in aortic valve diseases].
    Brose S; Autschbach R; Rauch T; Engel M; Mohr FW
    Z Kardiol; 2001; 90 Suppl 6():48-57. PubMed ID: 11826822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
    Mudra H; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.