These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27584137)
1. Step Activity and 6-Minute Walk Test Outcomes When Wearing Low-Activity or High-Activity Prosthetic Feet. Wurdeman SR; Schmid KK; Myers SA; Jacobsen AL; Stergiou N Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2017 May; 96(5):294-300. PubMed ID: 27584137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of self-report and performance-based outcome measures to determine functional differences between four categories of prosthetic feet. Gailey RS; Gaunaurd I; Agrawal V; Finnieston A; O'Toole C; Tolchin R J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(4):597-612. PubMed ID: 22773262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Energy storing and return prosthetic feet improve step length symmetry while preserving margins of stability in persons with transtibial amputation. Houdijk H; Wezenberg D; Hak L; Cutti AG J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(Suppl 1):76. PubMed ID: 30255807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiation between solid-ankle cushioned heel and energy storage and return prosthetic foot based on step-to-step transition cost. Wezenberg D; Cutti AG; Bruno A; Houdijk H J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(10):1579-90. PubMed ID: 25860285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of low- and high-level task performance in people with transtibial amputation using crossover and energy-storing prosthetic feet: A pilot study. Halsne EG; McDonald CL; Morgan SJ; Cheever SM; Hafner BJ Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Dec; 42(6):583-591. PubMed ID: 29779442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of prosthetic ankle energy storage and return properties on muscle activity in below-knee amputee walking. Ventura JD; Klute GK; Neptune RR Gait Posture; 2011 Feb; 33(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 21145747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Energy expenditure in people with transtibial amputation walking with crossover and energy storing prosthetic feet: A randomized within-subject study. McDonald CL; Kramer PA; Morgan SJ; Halsne EG; Cheever SM; Hafner BJ Gait Posture; 2018 May; 62():349-354. PubMed ID: 29614468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in high-functioning transfemoral amputees. Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J; Pros D Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 88(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 17532907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of postural steadiness in below-knee amputees when wearing different prosthetic feet during various sensory conditions using the Biodex® Stability System. Arifin N; Abu Osman NA; Ali S; Gholizadeh H; Wan Abas WA Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Jul; 229(7):491-8. PubMed ID: 26019139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Manufacture of energy storage and return prosthetic feet using selective laser sintering. South BJ; Fey NP; Bosker G; Neptune RR J Biomech Eng; 2010 Jan; 132(1):015001. PubMed ID: 20524754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of prosthetic foot type and visual alteration on postural steadiness in below-knee amputees. Arifin N; Abu Osman NA; Ali S; Wan Abas WA Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Mar; 13(1):23. PubMed ID: 24597518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of gait training and prosthetic foot category on external work symmetry during unilateral transtibial amputee gait. Agrawal V; Gailey R; O'Toole C; Gaunaurd I; Finnieston A Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Oct; 37(5):396-403. PubMed ID: 23364890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Symmetry in external work (SEW): a novel method of quantifying gait differences between prosthetic feet. Agrawal V; Gailey R; O'Toole C; Gaunaurd I; Dowell T Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Jun; 33(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 19367518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postural stability characteristics of transtibial amputees wearing different prosthetic foot types when standing on various support surfaces. Arifin N; Abu Osman NA; Ali S; Gholizadeh H; Abas WA ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():856279. PubMed ID: 25003155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel pivot ankle/foot prosthesis reduces sound side loading and risk for osteoarthritis: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Runciman P; Cockcroft J; Derman W Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Jun; 46(3):258-266. PubMed ID: 35019886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of oxygen consumption for conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in transfemoral amputees. Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J Clin Rehabil; 2008; 22(10-11):896-901. PubMed ID: 18955421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical characteristics, patient preference and activity level with different prosthetic feet: a randomized double blind trial with laboratory and community testing. Raschke SU; Orendurff MS; Mattie JL; Kenyon DE; Jones OY; Moe D; Winder L; Wong AS; Moreno-Hernández A; Highsmith MJ; J Sanderson D; Kobayashi T J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):146-52. PubMed ID: 25480541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Energy costs & performance of transtibial amputees & non-amputees during walking & running. Mengelkoch LJ; Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ Int J Sports Med; 2014 Dec; 35(14):1223-8. PubMed ID: 25144429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical efficiency during gait of adults with transtibial amputation: a pilot study comparing the SACH, Seattle, and Golden-Ankle prosthetic feet. Prince F; Winter DA; Sjonnensen G; Powell C; Wheeldon RK J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jun; 35(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 9651889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laboratory- and community-based health outcomes in people with transtibial amputation using crossover and energy-storing prosthetic feet: A randomized crossover trial. Morgan SJ; McDonald CL; Halsne EG; Cheever SM; Salem R; Kramer PA; Hafner BJ PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0189652. PubMed ID: 29414988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]