209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27584676)
1. Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Conventional Open Surgery for Patients With Spinal Metastasis: A Prospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Hansen-Algenstaedt N; Kwan MK; Algenstaedt P; Chiu CK; Viezens L; Chan TS; Lee CK; Wellbrock J; Chan CYW; Schaefer C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 May; 42(10):789-797. PubMed ID: 27584676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimal Invasive Surgery Instrumented Fusion versus Conventional Open Surgical Instrumented Fusion for the Treatment of Spinal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Pranata R; Lim MA; Vania R; Bagus Mahadewa TG
World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():e264-e274. PubMed ID: 33418123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for intradural-extramedullary spine tumors.
Wong AP; Lall RR; Dahdaleh NS; Lawton CD; Smith ZA; Wong RH; Harvey MJ; Lam S; Koski TR; Fessler RG
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Aug; 39(2):E11. PubMed ID: 26235009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression-the surgical learning curve.
Ahn J; Iqbal A; Manning BT; Leblang S; Bohl DD; Mayo BC; Massel DH; Singh K
Spine J; 2016 Aug; 16(8):909-16. PubMed ID: 26235463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of minimally invasive surgery with standard open surgery for vertebral thoracic metastases causing acute myelopathy in patients with short- or mid-term life expectancy: surgical technique and early clinical results.
Miscusi M; Polli FM; Forcato S; Ricciardi L; Frati A; Cimatti M; De Martino L; Ramieri A; Raco A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):518-25. PubMed ID: 25723122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of Outcomes Between Traditional Open versus Mini-Open Approach in Surgical Treatment of Spinal Metastasis.
Saadeh YS; Elswick CM; Fateh JA; Smith BW; Joseph JR; Spratt DE; Oppenlander ME; Park P; Szerlip NJ
World Neurosurg; 2019 Oct; 130():e467-e474. PubMed ID: 31247354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery: A Comparative Study of Minimally Invasive Approach Using Percutaneous Pedicle Screws Fixation Versus Open Approach.
Kumar N; Malhotra R; Maharajan K; Zaw AS; Wu PH; Makandura MC; Po Liu GK; Thambiah J; Wong HK
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Oct; 30(8):E1015-E1021. PubMed ID: 27352374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive percutaneous fixation techniques for metastatic spinal disease.
Rao PJ; Thayaparan GK; Fairhall JM; Mobbs RJ
Orthop Surg; 2014 Aug; 6(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 25179352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally Invasive Separation Surgery with Intraoperative Stereotactic Guidance: A Feasibility Study.
Nasser R; Nakhla J; Echt M; De la Garza Ramos R; Kinon MD; Sharan A; Yassari R
World Neurosurg; 2018 Jan; 109():68-76. PubMed ID: 28939543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Separation surgery for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: comparison of a minimally invasive versus open approach.
Echt M; Stock A; De la Garza Ramos R; Der E; Hamad M; Holland R; Cezayirli P; Nasser R; Yanamadala V; Yassari R
Neurosurg Focus; 2021 May; 50(5):E10. PubMed ID: 33932918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive spinal surgery for the management of symptomatic spinal metastasis.
Hamad A; Vachtsevanos L; Cattell A; Ockendon M; Balain B
Br J Neurosurg; 2017 Oct; 31(5):526-530. PubMed ID: 28264589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of minimally invasive transspinous and open approaches for thoracolumbar intradural-extramedullary spinal tumors.
Raygor KP; Than KD; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Aug; 39(2):E12. PubMed ID: 26235010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study.
Seng C; Siddiqui MA; Wong KP; Zhang K; Yeo W; Tan SB; Yue WM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):2049-55. PubMed ID: 23963015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally Invasive Muscle Sparing Posterior-Only Approach for Lumbar Circumferential Decompression and Stabilization to Treat Spine Metastasis--Technical Report.
Donnelly DJ; Abd-El-Barr MM; Lu Y
World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1484-90. PubMed ID: 26100166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does MIS Surgery Allow for Shorter Constructs in the Surgical Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity?
Uribe JS; Beckman J; Mummaneni PV; Okonkwo D; Nunley P; Wang MY; Mundis GM; Park P; Eastlack R; Anand N; Kanter A; Lamarca F; Fessler R; Shaffrey CI; Lafage V; Chou D; Deviren V;
Neurosurgery; 2017 Mar; 80(3):489-497. PubMed ID: 28362966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
