These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27585740)

  • 1. Guidelines to electrode positioning for human and animal electrical impedance myography research.
    Sanchez B; Pacheck A; Rutkove SB
    Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():32615. PubMed ID: 27585740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of electrical impedance myography using adhesive electrodes in healthy volunteers.
    Martinez-Gonzalez M; Montilla-Herrador J; García-Vidal JA; Escolar-Reina P; Gacto-Sánchez M; Medina-Mirapeix F
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2020 Dec; 55():102456. PubMed ID: 32905888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity distribution simulations of surface electrode configurations for electrical impedance myography.
    Rutkove SB; Pacheck A; Sanchez B
    Muscle Nerve; 2017 Nov; 56(5):887-895. PubMed ID: 28056494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrical impedance myography: transitioning from human to animal studies.
    Nie R; Sunmonu NA; Chin AB; Lee KS; Rutkove SB
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Aug; 117(8):1844-9. PubMed ID: 16807097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Subcutaneous Fat on Electrical Impedance Myography: Electrode Configuration and Multi-Frequency Analyses.
    Li L; Li X; Hu H; Shin H; Zhou P
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0156154. PubMed ID: 27227876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microneedle Electrode Array for Electrical Impedance Myography to Characterize Neurogenic Myopathy.
    Li Z; Li Y; Liu M; Cui L; Yu Y
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 May; 44(5):1566-75. PubMed ID: 26407702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimizing electrode configuration for electrical impedance measurements of muscle via the finite element method.
    Jafarpoor M; Li J; White JK; Rutkove SB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 May; 60(5):1446-52. PubMed ID: 23314763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recording characteristics of electrical impedance myography needle electrodes.
    Kwon H; Rutkove SB; Sanchez B
    Physiol Meas; 2017 Aug; 38(9):1748-1765. PubMed ID: 28721951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modelling and analysis of electrical impedance myography of the lateral tongue.
    Schooling CN; Jamie Healey T; McDonough HE; French SJ; McDermott CJ; Shaw PJ; Kadirkamanathan V; Alix JJP
    Physiol Meas; 2021 Jan; 41(12):125008. PubMed ID: 33207324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of Electrical Impedance Myography: A Comparison between Large and Small Handheld Electrode Arrays.
    Hu H; Lo WLA; Wang X; Li L; Zhou P
    J Healthc Eng; 2021; 2021():7296322. PubMed ID: 34765103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Test-retest reliability of electrical impedance myography in hamstrings of healthy young men.
    Honorato RC; Ferraz ASM; Kassiano W; Carvalho DP; Ceccatto VM
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2021 Feb; 56():102511. PubMed ID: 33454538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrical impedance myography in healthy volunteers.
    Offit MB; Mohammad Khanli H; Wu T; Lehky TJ
    Muscle Nerve; 2024 Mar; 69(3):288-294. PubMed ID: 37787098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of subcutaneous fat on electrical impedance myography when using a handheld electrode array: the case for measuring reactance.
    Sung M; Spieker AJ; Narayanaswami P; Rutkove SB
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Feb; 124(2):400-4. PubMed ID: 22917581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrode position and size in electrical impedance myography.
    Rutkove SB; Partida RA; Esper GJ; Aaron R; Shiffman CA
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Feb; 116(2):290-9. PubMed ID: 15661107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling and Reproducibility of Twin Concentric Electrical Impedance Myography.
    Cardoner MMM; Kwon H; Pulido HVG; Nagy J; Rutkove S; Sanchez B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Oct; 68(10):3068-3077. PubMed ID: 33661730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing sample size requirements for future ALS clinical trials with a dedicated electrical impedance myography system.
    Shefner JM; Rutkove SB; Caress JB; Benatar M; David WS; Cartwright MS; Macklin EA; Bohorquez JL
    Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener; 2018 Nov; 19(7-8):555-561. PubMed ID: 30265154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Invasive electrical impedance myography at different levels of contraction of gastrocnemius muscle of rat.
    Coutinho ABB; Jotta B; Werneck-de-Castro JP; Pino AV; Souza MN
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2020 Aug; 91(8):084103. PubMed ID: 32872900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimizing electrical impedance myography of the tongue in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
    Mcilduff CE; Yim SJ; Pacheck AK; Rutkove SB
    Muscle Nerve; 2017 Apr; 55(4):539-543. PubMed ID: 27511962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling and simulation of needle electrical impedance myography in nonhomogeneous isotropic skeletal muscle.
    Luo X; Wang S; Sanchez B
    IEEE J Electromagn RF Microw Med Biol; 2022 Mar; 6(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 35434441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of the muscle electrical properties in low back pain patients by electrical impedance myography.
    Ching CT; Chen YC; Lu LH; Hsieh PF; Hsiao CS; Sun TP; Shieh HL; Chang KM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e61639. PubMed ID: 23630604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.