These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27585780)

  • 1. Assessment of agreement between molar landmarks: Repeatability, reproducibility, and comparability.
    Kale Varlık S; Uzuner D; Tortop T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Sep; 150(3):504-10. PubMed ID: 27585780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Landmark errors on posteroanterior cephalograms.
    Ulkur F; Ozdemir F; Germec-Cakan D; Kaspar EC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):324-31. PubMed ID: 27476366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance.
    Fuziy A; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Janson G; Angelieri F; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):502-10. PubMed ID: 17045150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Size and shape analysis of human molars: comparing traditional and geometric morphometric techniques.
    Bernal V
    Homo; 2007; 58(4):279-96. PubMed ID: 17662983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
    Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
    Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interexaminer and intraexaminer reliabilities of 3-dimensional orthodontic digital setups.
    Fabels LN; Nijkamp PG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 25432262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative distalization effects of Jones jig and pendulum appliances.
    Patel MP; Janson G; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; de Freitas KM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 19268832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mandibular changes secondary to serial extractions compared with late premolar extractions and controls.
    Feldman E; Kennedy DB; Aleksejuniene J; Hannam AG; Yen EH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 26432319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement.
    Brickman CD; Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):526-34. PubMed ID: 11094366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
    Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
    Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial.
    Papadopoulos MA; Melkos AB; Athanasiou AE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of a segmented removable appliance in molar distalization.
    Akin E; Gurton AU; Sagdic D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 16436365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Occlusal changes following posterior tooth loss in adults. Part 2. Clinical parameters associated with movement of teeth adjacent to the site of posterior tooth loss.
    Craddock HL; Youngson CC; Manogue M; Blance A
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(6):495-501. PubMed ID: 17672834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
    Lagravère MO; Low C; Flores-Mir C; Chung R; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 20451778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment and posttreatment changes with combined headgear therapy.
    Tortop T; Yüksel S
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):857-63. PubMed ID: 17685765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Further analysis of mandibular molar crown and cusp areas in Pliocene and early Pleistocene hominids.
    Suwa G; Wood BA; White TD
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1994 Apr; 93(4):407-26. PubMed ID: 8048464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
    Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of landmark identification on postero-anterior cephalograms.
    Sicurezza E; Greco M; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Leonardi R
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 23021116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.