BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27586101)

  • 1. Evaluation of the crash mitigation effect of low-speed automated emergency braking systems based on insurance claims data.
    Isaksson-Hellman I; Lindman M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():42-7. PubMed ID: 27586101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.
    Cicchino JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):142-152. PubMed ID: 27898367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forward collision warning system impact.
    Hubele N; Kennedy K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S78-S83. PubMed ID: 30001148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics of rear-end crashes involving passenger vehicles with automatic emergency braking.
    Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S112-S118. PubMed ID: 31381436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimated benefit of automated emergency braking systems for vehicle-pedestrian crashes in the United States.
    Haus SH; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S171-S176. PubMed ID: 31381447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of front crash prevention systems in reducing large truck real-world crash rates.
    Teoh ER
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(4):284-289. PubMed ID: 33769151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intersection AEB implementation strategies for left turn across path crashes.
    Sander U; Lubbe N; Pietzsch S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S119-S125. PubMed ID: 31381448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking on rear-end crashes involving pickup trucks.
    Cicchino JB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):293-298. PubMed ID: 36853168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
    Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of the real-world safety effect of a lane change driver support system and characteristics of lane change crashes based on insurance claims data.
    Isaksson-Hellman I; Lindman M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S104-S111. PubMed ID: 29584482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating automated emergency braking performance in simulated car-to-two-wheeler crashes in China: A comparison between C-NCAP tests and in-depth crash data.
    Sui B; Lubbe N; Bärgman J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106229. PubMed ID: 34225169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Market penetration of intersection AEB: Characterizing avoided and residual straight crossing path accidents.
    Sander U; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():178-188. PubMed ID: 29604516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AEB effectiveness evaluation based on car-to-cyclist accident reconstructions using video of drive recorder.
    Zhao Y; Ito D; Mizuno K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 30822153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulating Automated Emergency Braking with and without Torricelli Vacuum Emergency Braking for cyclists: Effect of brake deceleration and sensor field-of-view on accidents, injuries and fatalities.
    Jeppsson H; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105538. PubMed ID: 32470821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A method for predicting crash configurations using counterfactual simulations and real-world data.
    Leledakis A; Lindman M; Östh J; Wågström L; Davidsson J; Jakobsson L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105932. PubMed ID: 33341681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects on crash risk of automatic emergency braking systems for pedestrians and bicyclists.
    Kullgren A; Amin K; Tingvall C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(sup1):S111-S115. PubMed ID: 37267014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimate of potential benefit for Europe of fitting Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems for pedestrian protection to passenger cars.
    Edwards M; Nathanson A; Wisch M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S173-82. PubMed ID: 25307384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of Integrated Pedestrian Protection Systems with Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) and Passive Safety Components.
    Edwards M; Nathanson A; Carroll J; Wisch M; Zander O; Lubbe N
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S2-S11. PubMed ID: 26027971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying Vision Zero: Crash avoidance in rural and motorway accident scenarios by combination of ACC, AEB, and LKS projected to German accident occurrence.
    Stark L; Düring M; Schoenawa S; Maschke JE; Do CM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S126-S132. PubMed ID: 31381430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.