215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27586105)
1. A robust estimation of the effects of motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB) based on in-depth crashes in Australia.
Savino G; Mackenzie J; Allen T; Baldock M; Brown J; Fitzharris M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():66-72. PubMed ID: 27586105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Further development of Motorcycle Autonomous Emergency Braking (MAEB), what can in-depth studies tell us? A multinational study.
Savino G; Rizzi M; Brown J; Piantini S; Meredith L; Albanese B; Pierini M; Fitzharris M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S165-72. PubMed ID: 25307383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the potential benefits of the motorcycle autonomous emergency braking using detailed crash reconstructions.
Savino G; Giovannini F; Baldanzini N; Pierini M; Rizzi M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14 Suppl():S40-9. PubMed ID: 23905921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Motorcycle Autonomous Emergency Braking (MAEB) employed as enhanced braking: Estimating the potential for injury reduction using real-world crash modeling.
Lucci C; Allen T; Pierini M; Savino G
Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S104-S110. PubMed ID: 34432553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the effect of motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB) based on real-world crashes.
Piantini S; Aathresh VN; Savino G; Pierini M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S174-S180. PubMed ID: 36200698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Field testing the applicability of motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB) during pre-crash avoidance maneuver.
Lucci C; Baldanzini N; Savino G
Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(3):246-251. PubMed ID: 33709844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploratory field trial of motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB): Considerations on the acceptability of unexpected automatic decelerations.
Savino G; Pierini M; Thompson J; Fitzharris M; Lenné MG
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Nov; 17(8):855-62. PubMed ID: 27028899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Motorcycle active safety systems: Assessment of the function and applicability using a population-based crash data set.
Savino G; Pierini M; Fitzharris M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(4):406-412. PubMed ID: 31059290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating automated emergency braking performance in simulated car-to-two-wheeler crashes in China: A comparison between C-NCAP tests and in-depth crash data.
Sui B; Lubbe N; Bärgman J
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106229. PubMed ID: 34225169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the crash mitigation effect of low-speed automated emergency braking systems based on insurance claims data.
Isaksson-Hellman I; Lindman M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():42-7. PubMed ID: 27586101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The real-world safety potential of connected vehicle technology.
Doecke S; Grant A; Anderson RW
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S31-5. PubMed ID: 26027973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characteristics of rear-end crashes involving passenger vehicles with automatic emergency braking.
Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S112-S118. PubMed ID: 31381436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.
Cicchino JB
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):142-152. PubMed ID: 27898367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the improved stability offered by motorcycle antilock brakes (ABS) make sliding crashes less common? In-depth analysis of fatal crashes involving motorcycles fitted with ABS.
Rizzi M; Strandroth J; Holst J; Tingvall C
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Aug; 17(6):625-32. PubMed ID: 26760265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The combined benefits of motorcycle antilock braking systems (ABS) in preventing crashes and reducing crash severity.
Rizzi M; Kullgren A; Tingvall C
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016; 17(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 26098303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. AEB effectiveness evaluation based on car-to-cyclist accident reconstructions using video of drive recorder.
Zhao Y; Ito D; Mizuno K
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 30822153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are front crash prevention systems less effective at preventing rear-end crashes where trucks and motorcycles are struck?
Cicchino JB; Kidd DG
Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(3):440-444. PubMed ID: 38466620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing the acceptability of motorcycle-AEB system: Use of unanticipated interventions as a reliable surrogate of genuinely unexpected events.
Huertas-Leyva P; Savino G; Baldanzini N
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(2):132-139. PubMed ID: 36697386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of an autonomous braking system in real-world PTW crashes.
Savino G; Pierini M; Rizzi M; Frampton R
Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(5):532-43. PubMed ID: 23697899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective assessment of the effectiveness of autonomous emergency braking in car-to-cyclist accidents in France.
Chajmowicz H; Saadé J; Cuny S
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S20-S25. PubMed ID: 31750740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
