These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

527 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27586670)

  • 21. Refractive error after cataract surgery combined with descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
    de Sanctis U; Damiani F; Brusasco L; Grignolo F
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 156(2):254-259.e1. PubMed ID: 23870359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard.
    Kaswin G; Rousseau A; Mgarrech M; Barreau E; Labetoulle M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 24680520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scheimpflug corneal power measurements for intraocular lens power calculation in cataract surgery.
    Saad E; Shammas MC; Shammas HJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Sep; 156(3):460-467.e2. PubMed ID: 23810477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scheimpflug photography keratometry readings for routine intraocular lens power calculation.
    Shammas HJ; Hoffer KJ; Shammas MC
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):330-4. PubMed ID: 19185251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intraocular lens power calculation by ray-tracing after myopic excimer laser surgery.
    Savini G; Bedei A; Barboni P; Ducoli P; Hoffer KJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 157(1):150-153.e1. PubMed ID: 24099275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings after corneal refractive surgery.
    Tang Q; Hoffer KJ; Olson MD; Miller KM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1198-203. PubMed ID: 19545808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intraocular lens power calculation after radial keratotomy: estimating the refractive corneal power.
    Awwad ST; Dwarakanathan S; Bowman RW; Cavanagh HD; Verity SM; Mootha VV; McCulley JP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17531701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intraocular lens power calculation using a Placido disk-Scheimpflug tomographer in eyes that had previous myopic corneal excimer laser surgery.
    Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Barboni P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 Aug; 44(8):935-941. PubMed ID: 30049566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings after corneal refractive surgery in the absence of clinical history.
    Bialer OY; Kaiserman I; Bahar I
    Ophthalmic Res; 2014; 52(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 25402842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prediction of residual astigmatism after cataract surgery using swept source fourier domain optical coherence tomography.
    Hoffmann PC; Abraham M; Hirnschall N; Findl O
    Curr Eye Res; 2014 Dec; 39(12):1178-86. PubMed ID: 25310575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of IOL power calculation and refractive outcome after laser refractive cataract surgery with a femtosecond laser versus conventional phacoemulsification.
    Filkorn T; Kovács I; Takács A; Horváth E; Knorz MC; Nagy ZZ
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Aug; 28(8):540-4. PubMed ID: 22785062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas.
    Reitblat O; Assia EI; Kleinmann G; Levy A; Barrett GD; Abulafia A
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015; 43(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 25491591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of accuracy of intraocular lens calculations using automated keratometry, a Placido-based corneal topographer, and a combined Placido-based and dual Scheimpflug corneal topographer.
    Shirayama M; Wang L; Koch DD; Weikert MP
    Cornea; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1136-8. PubMed ID: 20595893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of Intraoperative Aberrometry, OCT-Based IOL Formula, Haigis-L, and Masket Formulae for IOL Power Calculation after Laser Vision Correction.
    Fram NR; Masket S; Wang L
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Jun; 122(6):1096-101. PubMed ID: 25766733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of ocular biometric factors on the accuracy of various IOL power calculation formulas.
    Jeong J; Song H; Lee JK; Chuck RS; Kwon JW
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 17(1):62. PubMed ID: 28464806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Refractive predictability using two optical biometers and refraction types for intraocular lens power calculation in cataract surgery.
    Cheng H; Li J; Cheng B; Wu M
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul; 40(7):1849-1856. PubMed ID: 32297050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of Methodologies Using Estimated or Measured Values of Total Corneal Astigmatism for Toric Intraocular Lens Power Calculation.
    Ferreira TB; Ribeiro P; Ribeiro FJ; O'Neill JG
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Dec; 33(12):794-800. PubMed ID: 29227506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of minus power intraocular lens calculation using OKULIX ray tracing software.
    Nabil KM
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 39(8):1803-1808. PubMed ID: 30141002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of optical biometry combined with Placido disc corneal topography for intraocular lens power calculation.
    Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Barboni P; Balducci N; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Ducoli P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172634. PubMed ID: 28231267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ray-tracing intraocular lens power calculation using anterior segment optical coherence tomography measurements.
    Minami K; Kataoka Y; Matsunaga J; Ohtani S; Honbou M; Miyata K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1758-63. PubMed ID: 22857986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.