These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27586715)

  • 21. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predicting binaural speech intelligibility using the signal-to-noise ratio in the envelope power spectrum domain.
    Chabot-Leclerc A; MacDonald EN; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):192. PubMed ID: 27475146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of masker type on early reflection processing and speech intelligibility (L).
    Arweiler I; Buchholz JM; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 23297878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The intelligibility of Lombard speech for non-native listeners.
    Cooke M; Lecumberri ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1120-9. PubMed ID: 22894231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Speech intelligibility prediction based on modulation frequency-selective processing.
    Relaño-Iborra H; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108610. PubMed ID: 36163219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speech recognition against harmonic and inharmonic complexes: spectral dips and periodicity.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF; Chatterjee M; Limb CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 May; 135(5):2873-84. PubMed ID: 24815268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spectro-temporal modulation masking patterns reveal frequency selectivity.
    Oetjen A; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):714-23. PubMed ID: 25698006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The intelligibility of speech in a harmonic masker varying in fundamental frequency contour, broadband temporal envelope, and spatial location.
    Leclère T; Lavandier M; Deroche MLD
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():1-10. PubMed ID: 28390253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech.
    Calandruccio L; Dhar S; Bradlow AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):860-9. PubMed ID: 20707455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Channel selection in the modulation domain for improved speech intelligibility in noise.
    Wójcicki KK; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2904-13. PubMed ID: 22501068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Characteristics of spectro-temporal modulation frequency selectivity in humans.
    Oetjen A; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1887. PubMed ID: 28372116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of spectro-temporal modulation changes produced by multi-channel compression on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1063-76. PubMed ID: 18247908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A context-based approach to predict speech intelligibility in interrupted noise: Model design.
    van Schoonhoven J; Rhebergen KS; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Feb; 151(2):1404. PubMed ID: 35232064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. No evidence for a benefit from masker harmonicity in the perception of speech in noise.
    Steinmetzger K; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Feb; 153(2):1064. PubMed ID: 36859153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modulation masking and fine structure shape neural envelope coding to predict speech intelligibility across diverse listening conditions.
    Viswanathan V; Bharadwaj HM; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Heinz MG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Sep; 150(3):2230. PubMed ID: 34598642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Phase effects in masking by harmonic complexes: detection of bands of speech-shaped noise.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF; Chatterjee M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Nov; 136(5):2726-36. PubMed ID: 25373972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of spatial separation in distance on the intelligibility of speech in rooms.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):757-67. PubMed ID: 25698010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A dynamic binaural harmonic-cancellation model to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker varying in intonation, temporal envelope, and location.
    Prud'homme L; Lavandier M; Best V
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108535. PubMed ID: 35654633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.