These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27586734)

  • 1. Envelope and intensity based prediction of psychoacoustic masking and speech intelligibility.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):1023. PubMed ID: 27586734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of short-time intensity and envelope power for speech intelligibility and psychoacoustic masking.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1098. PubMed ID: 28863616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A multi-resolution envelope-power based model for speech intelligibility.
    Jørgensen S; Ewert SD; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):436-46. PubMed ID: 23862819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modelling speech intelligibility in adverse conditions.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():343-51. PubMed ID: 23716240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting binaural speech intelligibility using the signal-to-noise ratio in the envelope power spectrum domain.
    Chabot-Leclerc A; MacDonald EN; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):192. PubMed ID: 27475146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech intelligibility prediction based on modulation frequency-selective processing.
    Relaño-Iborra H; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108610. PubMed ID: 36163219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting speech intelligibility based on a correlation metric in the envelope power spectrum domain.
    Relaño-Iborra H; May T; Zaar J; Scheidiger C; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2670. PubMed ID: 27794330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of manipulating the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio on speech intelligibility.
    Jørgensen S; Decorsière R; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1401-10. PubMed ID: 25786952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The near non-existence of "pure" energetic masking release for speech: Extension to spectro-temporal modulation and glimpsing.
    Stone MA; Canavan S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):832. PubMed ID: 27586715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monaural speech intelligibility and detection in maskers with varying amounts of spectro-temporal speech features.
    Schubotz W; Brand T; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):524. PubMed ID: 27475175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of an extended equalization-cancellation model to speech intelligibility with spatially distributed maskers.
    Wan R; Durlach NI; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3678-90. PubMed ID: 21218900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simulation framework for auditory discrimination experiments: Revealing the importance of across-frequency processing in speech perception.
    Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2708. PubMed ID: 27250164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A dynamic binaural harmonic-cancellation model to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker varying in intonation, temporal envelope, and location.
    Prud'homme L; Lavandier M; Best V
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108535. PubMed ID: 35654633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting the effects of periodicity on the intelligibility of masked speech: An evaluation of different modelling approaches and their limitations.
    Steinmetzger K; Zaar J; Relaño-Iborra H; Rosen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Oct; 146(4):2562. PubMed ID: 31671986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of masker type on early reflection processing and speech intelligibility (L).
    Arweiler I; Buchholz JM; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 23297878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A context-based approach to predict speech intelligibility in interrupted noise: Model design.
    van Schoonhoven J; Rhebergen KS; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Feb; 151(2):1404. PubMed ID: 35232064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3988-97. PubMed ID: 17225425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.