These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27586746)

  • 1. Human recognition of familiar voices.
    Wenndt SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):1172. PubMed ID: 27586746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. L2 voice recognition: The role of speaker-, listener-, and stimulus-related factors.
    Drozdova P; van Hout R; Scharenborg O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):3058. PubMed ID: 29195438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Highly accurate and robust identity perception from personally familiar voices.
    Kanber E; Lavan N; McGettigan C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Apr; 151(4):897-911. PubMed ID: 34672658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The processing of intimately familiar and unfamiliar voices: Specific neural responses of speaker recognition and identification.
    Plante-Hébert J; Boucher VJ; Jemel B
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250214. PubMed ID: 33861789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Familiarity and Voice Representation: From Acoustic-Based Representation to Voice Averages.
    Fontaine M; Love SA; Latinus M
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1180. PubMed ID: 28769836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impaired generalization of speaker identity in the perception of familiar and unfamiliar voices.
    Lavan N; Scott SK; McGettigan C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Dec; 145(12):1604-1614. PubMed ID: 27632378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit.
    Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):472-84. PubMed ID: 14663347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic parameters in human speaker recognition.
    van Dommelen WA
    Lang Speech; 1990; 33 ( Pt 3)():259-72. PubMed ID: 2093780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. It doesn't matter what you say: FMRI correlates of voice learning and recognition independent of speech content.
    Zäske R; Awwad Shiekh Hasan B; Belin P
    Cortex; 2017 Sep; 94():100-112. PubMed ID: 28738288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis.
    Chen W; Jiang X
    J Vis Exp; 2024 Aug; (210):. PubMed ID: 39185861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gender differences in familiar voice identification.
    Skuk VG; Schweinberger SR
    Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():131-40. PubMed ID: 23168357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance-intensity functions of Mandarin word recognition tests in noise: test dialect and listener language effects.
    Liu D; Shi LF
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):147-56. PubMed ID: 23800810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Use of Voice Cues for Speaker Gender Recognition in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Meister H; Fürsen K; Streicher B; Lang-Roth R; Walger M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 59(3):546-56. PubMed ID: 27135985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How does familiarity with a voice affect trait judgements?
    Lavan N; Mileva M; McGettigan C
    Br J Psychol; 2021 Feb; 112(1):282-300. PubMed ID: 32445499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How many voices did you hear? Natural variability disrupts identity perception from unfamiliar voices.
    Lavan N; Burston LFK; Garrido L
    Br J Psychol; 2019 Aug; 110(3):576-593. PubMed ID: 30221374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Familiar Voices Are More Intelligible, Even if They Are Not Recognized as Familiar.
    Holmes E; Domingo Y; Johnsrude IS
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Oct; 29(10):1575-1583. PubMed ID: 30096018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.