These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27586748)

  • 1. Better-ear glimpsing at low frequencies in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Rana B; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):1192. PubMed ID: 27586748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of audibility on better-ear glimpsing as a function of frequency in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Rana B; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2195. PubMed ID: 29716302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech.
    Ozmeral EJ; Buss E; Hall JW
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154920. PubMed ID: 27144601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Better-ear glimpsing in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Best V; Mason CR; Kidd G; Iyer N; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL213-9. PubMed ID: 25698053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of improving audibility on better-ear glimpsing using non-linear amplification.
    Rana B; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Dec; 144(6):3465. PubMed ID: 30599669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
    Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    D'Aquila LA; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting speech intelligibility in hearing-impaired listeners using a physiologically inspired auditory model.
    Zaar J; Carney LH
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108553. PubMed ID: 35750575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of better-ear glimpsing on spatial release from masking.
    Glyde H; Buchholz J; Dillon H; Best V; Hickson L; Cameron S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2937-45. PubMed ID: 24116429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abnormal intelligibility of speech in competing speech and in noise in a frequency region where audiometric thresholds are near-normal for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Léger AC; Ives DT; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():102-9. PubMed ID: 25124152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection threshold for sound distortion resulting from noise reduction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1375. PubMed ID: 25190410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution.
    Jin SH; Nelson PB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):3097-108. PubMed ID: 16708964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial release from masking in children with bilateral cochlear implants and with normal hearing: Effect of target-interferer similarity.
    Misurelli SM; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):319-31. PubMed ID: 26233032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.