These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 275873)

  • 1. A two year report of a human bone block.
    Ricciardi A
    Quintessence Int Dent Dig; 1977 Jan; 8(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 275873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Histopathologic study of supporting tissues of an endosteal implant.
    James RA
    Implantologist; 1976 Oct; 1(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 802228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Value of radiological examination in endosseous alloplastic frame implants for dental prosthesis].
    Mlosek K; Sołtan M
    Pol Przegl Radiol; 1983; 47(5-6):355-60. PubMed ID: 6379609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Failures in implantology].
    Bertazzo C; Casabona E; Ciliberti F; Cottone G; Pegazzano E
    Parodontol Stomatol (Nuova); 1985; 24(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 3937993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An alternative technique to the endosseous blade implant.
    Fagan MJ
    J Oral Implantol; 1979; 8(4):559-62. PubMed ID: 398890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship of bone resorption around dental implants to abutment design: a preliminary 1-year clinical study.
    Hasan I; Heinemann F; Bourauel C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(5):457-9. PubMed ID: 21909487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The anchor endosteal implant.
    Cranin AN
    Dent Clin North Am; 1980 Jul; 24(3):505-19. PubMed ID: 6995179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guided bone regeneration in clinical practice: idealization of functional and esthetic endpoints.
    Fugazzotto PA
    J Mass Dent Soc; 1996; 45(1):10-2, 14. PubMed ID: 9520671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study.
    Lekholm U; Gunne J; Henry P; Higuchi K; Lindén U; Bergström C; van Steenberghe D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(5):639-45. PubMed ID: 10531735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immediate occlusal loading of implants in the partially edentate mandible: a prospective 1-year radiographic and 4-year clinical study.
    Ostman PO; Hellman M; Sennerby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):315-22. PubMed ID: 18548929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The FES implant as a posterior abutment for a fixed prosthesis in the mandible.
    Fagan MJ
    J Ga Dent Assoc; 1979; 52(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 390975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrospective clinical evaluation of an internal tube-in-tube dental implant after 4 years, with special emphasis on peri-implant bone resorption.
    Al-Nawas B; Kämmerer PW; Morbach T; Ophoven F; Wagner W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1309-16. PubMed ID: 22167438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of marginal bone level change of multiple adjacent implants restored with splinted and nonsplinted restorations: a 5-year prospective study.
    Vigolo P; Zaccaria M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1189-94. PubMed ID: 21197497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vitreous carbon root-replacement system: final report.
    Meffert RM
    J Oral Implantol; 1983; 11(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 6584639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Follow-up findings in oral implants.
    Schlegel KD
    J Oral Implantol; 1984; 11(3):371-85. PubMed ID: 6596438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Pathological findings in enosseous and subperiosteal implantations].
    Pape HD; Heiss R
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1977 Apr; 32(4):308-10. PubMed ID: 266995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histologic analysis of the interface of a titanium implant retrieved from a nonvascularized mandibular block graft after a 10-month loading period.
    Piattelli A; Degidi M; Marchetti C; Scarano A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):840-3. PubMed ID: 9425766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
    Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption in patients with overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants in a 10-year prospective comparative study.
    de Jong MH; Wright PS; Meijer HJ; Tymstra N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1168-74. PubMed ID: 21197494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of sinus bone resorption and marginal bone loss after sinus bone grafting and implant placement.
    Kim YK; Yun PY; Kim SG; Kim BS; Ong JL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):e21-8. PubMed ID: 19138634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.