These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27587923)

  • 1. Change in Speech Perception and Auditory Evoked Potentials over Time after Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deaf Adults.
    Purdy SC; Kelly AS
    Semin Hear; 2016 Feb; 37(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 27587923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures.
    Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Acoustic Change Complex Compared to Hearing Performance in Unilaterally and Bilaterally Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.
    van Heteren JAA; Vonck BMD; Stokroos RJ; Versnel H; Lammers MJW
    Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1783-1799. PubMed ID: 35696186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
    Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Altered cortical activity in prelingually deafened cochlear implant users following long periods of auditory deprivation.
    Lammers MJ; Versnel H; van Zanten GA; Grolman W
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Feb; 16(1):159-70. PubMed ID: 25315357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrically evoked auditory middle latency responses versus perception abilities in cochlear implant users.
    Groenen P; Snik A; van den Broek P
    Audiology; 1997; 36(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 9099406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical reorganization after cochlear implantation for adults with single-sided deafness.
    Legris E; Galvin J; Roux S; Gomot M; Aoustin JM; Marx M; He S; Bakhos D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204402. PubMed ID: 30248131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Restoration of cortical symmetry and binaural function: Cortical auditory evoked responses in adult cochlear implant users with single sided deafness.
    Wedekind A; Rajan G; Van Dun B; Távora-Vieira D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227371. PubMed ID: 31935234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra- and interindividual correlations between auditory evoked potentials and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Makhdoum MJ; Groenen PA; Snik AF; van den Broek P
    Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 9505287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of cochlear implant users' performance using middle and late latency responses.
    Kurnaz M; Satar B; Yetiser S
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Mar; 266(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 18560864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F; Lehmann A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech-evoked cortical potentials and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.
    Groenen PA; Beynon AJ; Snik AF; van den Broek P
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 11330917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Changes of the late acoustically evoked potentials in postlingually deaf patients with cochlear implants].
    Schmidt R; Kaftan H; Hosemann W; Gräbel S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Mar; 84(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 15770566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
    Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noise-Induced Change of Cortical Temporal Processing in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Han JH; Lee J; Lee HJ
    Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 13(3):241-248. PubMed ID: 31902201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model.
    Bond M; Mealing S; Anderson R; Elston J; Weiner G; Taylor RS; Hoyle M; Liu Z; Price A; Stein K
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Sep; 13(44):1-330. PubMed ID: 19799825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peripheral and Central Contributions to Cortical Responses in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Scheperle RA; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):430-40. PubMed ID: 25658747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.