BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27588336)

  • 1. Sensitivity evaluation of the visual, tactile, and auditory detection response task method while driving.
    Stojmenova K; Jakus G; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(4):431-436. PubMed ID: 27588336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of auditory detection response task method for assessing the attentional effects of cognitive load.
    Stojmenova K; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jul; 19(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 29461865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the selection of stimulus for the auditory variant of the detection response task method for driving experiments.
    Stojmenova K; Policardi F; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 28594238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling cognitive load effects of conversation between a passenger and driver.
    Tillman G; Strayer D; Eidels A; Heathcote A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1795-1803. PubMed ID: 28537009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An analysis of the suitability of a low-cost eye tracker for assessing the cognitive load of drivers.
    Čegovnik T; Stojmenova K; Jakus G; Sodnik J
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Apr; 68():1-11. PubMed ID: 29409621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effects of Cognitive and Visual Workload on Peripheral Detection in the Detection Response Task.
    van Winsum W
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):855-869. PubMed ID: 29791188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Broader Application of the Detection Response Task to Cognitive Tasks and Online Environments.
    Innes RJ; Evans NJ; Howard ZL; Eidels A; Brown SD
    Hum Factors; 2021 Aug; 63(5):896-909. PubMed ID: 32749155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection-Response Task-Uses and Limitations.
    Stojmenova K; Sodnik J
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Feb; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 29443949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring driver distraction - Evaluation of the box task method as a tool for assessing in-vehicle system demand.
    Morgenstern T; Wögerbauer EM; Naujoks F; Krems JF; Keinath A
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Oct; 88():103181. PubMed ID: 32678787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the Cost of Detection Response Task Performance on Cognitive Load.
    Biondi FN; Balasingam B; Ayare P
    Hum Factors; 2021 Aug; 63(5):804-812. PubMed ID: 32552116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement of auditory cues in drivers' distraction.
    Lin CY; Hsu CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Oct; 111(2):503-16. PubMed ID: 21162452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of age and auditory and visual dual tasks on closed-road driving performance.
    Chaparro A; Wood JM; Carberry T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 82(8):747-54. PubMed ID: 16127341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phase coherence of auditory steady-state response reflects the amount of cognitive workload in a modified N-back task.
    Yokota Y; Naruse Y
    Neurosci Res; 2015 Nov; 100():39-45. PubMed ID: 26149892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period?
    Levy J; Pashler H; Boer E
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 16507063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of cognitive workload of in-vehicle systems using a visual peripheral and tactile detection task setting.
    Bengler K; Kohlmann M; Lange C
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4919-23. PubMed ID: 22317480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optic Flow and Tunnel Vision in the Detection Response Task.
    van Winsum W
    Hum Factors; 2019 Sep; 61(6):992-1003. PubMed ID: 30707630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of stimulus modality on signal detection: implications for assessing the safety of in-vehicle technology.
    Merat N; Jamson AH
    Hum Factors; 2008 Feb; 50(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 18354978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of auditory and tactile warning on response to visual hazards under a noisy environment.
    Murata A; Kuroda T; Karwowski W
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Apr; 60():58-67. PubMed ID: 28166900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of cognitive and visual loads on driving performance after take-over request (TOR) in automated driving.
    Choi D; Sato T; Ando T; Abe T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    Appl Ergon; 2020 May; 85():103074. PubMed ID: 32174362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.