These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27588336)

  • 21. Tactile Stimuli Increase Effects of Modality Compatibility in Task Switching.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 26421450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of secondary task cognitive processing demand on driving performance.
    Blanco M; Biever WJ; Gallagher JP; Dingus TA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):895-906. PubMed ID: 16584702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Early auditory change detection implicitly facilitated by ignored concurrent visual change during a Braille reading task.
    Aoyama A; Haruyama T; Kuriki S
    J Integr Neurosci; 2013 Sep; 12(3):385-99. PubMed ID: 24070061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Supporting interruption management and multimodal interface design: three meta-analyses of task performance as a function of interrupting task modality.
    Lu SA; Wickens CD; Prinet JC; Hutchins SD; Sarter N; Sebok A
    Hum Factors; 2013 Aug; 55(4):697-724. PubMed ID: 23964412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Driving reaction time before and after primary fusion of the lumbar spine.
    Liebensteiner MC; Birkfellner F; Thaler M; Haid C; Bach C; Krismer M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 20075774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Were they in the loop during automated driving? Links between visual attention and crash potential.
    Louw T; Madigan R; Carsten O; Merat N
    Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 23(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 27655754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Non-visual spatial tasks reveal increased interactions with stance postural control.
    Woollacott M; Vander Velde T
    Brain Res; 2008 May; 1208():95-102. PubMed ID: 18394592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Concurrent emotional pictures modulate temporal order judgments of spatially separated audio-tactile stimuli.
    Jia L; Shi Z; Zang X; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 1537():156-63. PubMed ID: 24041776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of cognitive load on susceptibility to audio.
    van der Heiden RMA; Janssen CP; Donker SF; Kenemans JL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Apr; 205():103058. PubMed ID: 32199246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of alcohol intoxication goggles (fatal vision goggles) with a concurrent cognitive task on simulated driving performance.
    Irwin C; Desbrow B; McCartney D
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(8):777-782. PubMed ID: 31725332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of visual-verbal load and spatial compatibility on stimulus response.
    Huang WS; Hsu CC; Liu CC; Lai CH
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Apr; 108(2):487-502. PubMed ID: 21675563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effectiveness of auditory and tactile crossmodal cues in a dual-task visual and auditory scenario.
    Hopkins K; Kass SJ; Blalock LD; Brill JC
    Ergonomics; 2017 May; 60(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 27267493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cognitive Load and Situation Awareness for Soldiers: Effects of Message Presentation Rate and Sensory Modality.
    Hollands JG; Spivak T; Kramkowski EW
    Hum Factors; 2019 Aug; 61(5):763-773. PubMed ID: 30768371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: the effects of providing visual speech cues.
    Fraser S; Gagné JP; Alepins M; Dubois P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 53(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 19635945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Detection of brake lights while distracted: Separating peripheral vision from cognitive load.
    Wolfe B; Sawyer BD; Kosovicheva A; Reimer B; Rosenholtz R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2798-2813. PubMed ID: 31222659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cognitive workload measurement and modeling under divided attention.
    Castro SC; Strayer DL; Matzke D; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jun; 45(6):826-839. PubMed ID: 30998070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Emotion and object processing in Parkinson's disease.
    Cohen H; Gagné MH; Hess U; Pourcher E
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):457-63. PubMed ID: 20167412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sensitivity of subjective questionnaires to cognitive loading while driving with navigation aids: a pilot study.
    Smyth CC
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 May; 78(5 Suppl):B39-50. PubMed ID: 17547303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.