187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2758928)
1. [Investigation on reduction of radiation dose and optimization of exposure parameters in radiography].
Fei DS
Zhonghua Fang She Xue Za Zhi; 1989 Apr; 23(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 2758928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Collective radiation dosage due to radiodiagnostic practice in France in 1982. Methodology. 1].
Fagnani F; Maccia C; Benedittini M; Lefaure C
J Radiol; 1986 Oct; 67(10):745-53. PubMed ID: 3795181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 4: Entrance doses achieved during the X-ray examination of the chest].
Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1082-103. PubMed ID: 19009497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Determination of the effective dose for CT examinations and influence of the setup parameters].
Koller F; Roth J
Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17203442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous vertebroplasty: assessment of radiation doses and implementation of procedural routines to reduce operator exposure.
von Wrangel A; Cederblad A; Rodriguez-Catarino M
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jun; 50(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19363715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [CR (Computed Radiography)].
Matsumoto M
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 12766288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Dose reduction in high-resolution MSCT examinations of the chest for early detection of pneumonia in immunocompromised patients].
Yamamura J; Wildberger JE; Nagel HD; Dichtl D; Adam G; Wedegärtner U
Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):549-55. PubMed ID: 19306239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
Huda W
Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The additional dose to radiosensitive organs caused by using under-collimated X-ray beams in neonatal intensive care radiography.
Datz H; Ben-Shlomo A; Bader D; Sadetzki S; Juster-Reicher A; Marks K; Smolkin T; Zangen S; Margaliot M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(4):518-24. PubMed ID: 18375467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
Tingberg A; Sjöström D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Multislice spiral CT (MSCT) in pediatric radiology: dose reduction for chest and abdomen examinations].
Honnef D; Wildberger JE; Stargardt A; Hohl C; Barker M; Günther RW; Staatz G
Rofo; 2004 Jul; 176(7):1021-30. PubMed ID: 15237346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of patient doses for common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Latvian hospitals, analysis of radiographic techniques and comparison with European guidelines.
Bogucarskis K; Salmins A; Gfirtner H; Anatschkowa E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):176-9. PubMed ID: 15933103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 5: organ doses in chest radiography].
Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
Rofo; 2009 May; 181(5):454-71. PubMed ID: 19391068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of AEC chamber selection on patient dose and image quality.
Hawking N; Elmore A
Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(5):411-9. PubMed ID: 19457845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetry intercomparison using a 35-keV X-ray synchrotron beam.
Oves SD; Hogstrom KR; Ham K; Sajo E; Dugas JP
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S121-5. PubMed ID: 18586431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
