These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2758928)
61. Dose reduction in radiography of the spine in scoliosis. Andersen PE; Andersen PE; van der Kooy P Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1982; 23(3A):251-3. PubMed ID: 7124444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. The level of radiation exposure of critical organs of the patient and the examiner during arteriographies. Schmitt G; Lohr E; Ewen K Ann Radiol (Paris); 1979 May; 22(4):333-6. PubMed ID: 496275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Exposure reduction through faster speed film-screen systems and a review of A.L.A.R.A. (as low as reasonably achievable). Nickoli PC Can J Med Radiat Technol; 1993 Aug; 24(3):98-107. PubMed ID: 10127889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Methods to reduce radiation exposure in diagnostic radiology. Moore RT; Stewart HF Environ Health Ser Radiol Health; 1968 Sep; 33():72-7. PubMed ID: 5731966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Technical possibilities to reduce radiation exposure during angiography. Ullrich HM Ann Radiol (Paris); 1979 May; 22(4):331-2. PubMed ID: 496274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. [Usefulness of high energy radiation using copper filter on CR chest radiography]. Matsumoto >; Kawamoto K; Inoue S Igaku Butsuri; 2000; 20(3):123-130. PubMed ID: 12764243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. [Experimental investigations of the dosimetric features of the x-ray radiation used in x-ray diagnosis]. Prostiakova MA Gig Sanit; 1975 Oct; (10):40-5. PubMed ID: 1218759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. [The problem of radiation exposure during radiography of the entire spine]. Bernau A; Bauer J; Graule A; Seeger W; Sell S Rofo; 1994 Oct; 161(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 7948982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. A collimator for reduced radiation dose with improved visualization of soft tissues. Freedman ML; Matteson SR Radiology; 1976 Jan; 118(1):226-8. PubMed ID: 1244661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. [Control of X radiodiagnosis installations under the aspect of dose reduction to patients]. Delhove J J Belge Radiol; 1971; 54(6):721-5. PubMed ID: 5145143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Effect of changes in imaging technology on dose received by technologists. Hale J; Laufer I; Ditz BL Radiology; 1989 Nov; 173(2):576. PubMed ID: 2798898 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Industrial X-ray study in Jefferson County, Alabama. Seagle EF; Sauer KG; Russey FE Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1966; 27(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 5971110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. The influence of tube filtration and potential on patient dose during x-ray examinations. Shrimpton PC; Jones DG; Wall BF Phys Med Biol; 1988 Oct; 33(10):1205-12. PubMed ID: 3194449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]