These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27589359)

  • 1. The Reliability of a Novel Mobile 3-dimensional Wound Measurement Device.
    Anghel EL; Kumar A; Bigham TE; Maselli KM; Steinberg JS; Evans KK; Kim PJ; Attinger CE
    Wounds; 2016 Nov; 28(11):379-386. PubMed ID: 27589359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of three-dimensional wound measurements using a novel 3D-WAM camera.
    Jørgensen LB; Skov-Jeppesen SM; Halekoh U; Rasmussen BS; Sørensen JA; Jemec GBE; Yderstraede KB
    Wound Repair Regen; 2018 Nov; 26(6):456-462. PubMed ID: 30118155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-dimensional wound measurement: comparison of 4 techniques.
    Langemo DK; Melland H; Hanson D; Olson B; Hunter S; Henly SJ
    Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(7):337-43. PubMed ID: 10326350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reliability of a handheld wound measurement and documentation device in clinical practice.
    Hammond CE; Nixon MA
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2011; 38(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 21483270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of computer-assisted and manual wound size measurement.
    Thawer HA; Houghton PE; Woodbury MG; Keast D; Campbell K
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2002 Oct; 48(10):46-53. PubMed ID: 12378003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pilot study to evaluate a novel three-dimensional wound measurement device.
    Bills JD; Berriman SJ; Noble DL; Lavery LA; Davis KE
    Int Wound J; 2016 Dec; 13(6):1372-1377. PubMed ID: 26558349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of 2 wound volume measurement methods.
    Langemo DK; Melland H; Olson B; Hanson D; Hunter S; Henly SJ; Thompson P
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2001; 14(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 11902344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of the skin compliance device in the assessment of scar pliability.
    Cleary C; Sanders AK; Nick TG
    J Hand Ther; 2007; 20(3):232-7; quiz 238. PubMed ID: 17658416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a Novel Three-Dimensional Wound Measurement Device for Assessment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
    Pena G; Kuang B; Szpak Z; Cowled P; Dawson J; Fitridge R
    Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle); 2020 Nov; 9(11):623-631. PubMed ID: 33095125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interrater and intrarater reliability of silhouette wound imaging device.
    Miller C; Karimi L; Donohue L; Kapp S
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2012 Nov; 25(11):513-8. PubMed ID: 23080239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds.
    Laplaud AL; Blaizot X; Gaillard C; Morice A; Lebreuilly I; Clément C; Parienti JJ; Dompmartin A
    Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20082676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra and interrater reliability for lower limb flexibility assessment using photogrammetry.
    Nonnenmacher CH; de Estéfani D; Benincá IL; da Silveira MP; Nunes GS; Haupenthal A
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2023 Jul; 35():364-370. PubMed ID: 37330794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ways to increase precision and accuracy of wound area measurement using smart devices: Advanced app Planimator.
    Foltynski P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0192485. PubMed ID: 29505569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Criterion-related validity of a clinical measure of dorsal first ray mobility.
    Glasoe WM; Getsoian S; Myers M; Komnick M; Kolkebeck D; Oswald W; Liakos P
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2005 Sep; 35(9):589-93. PubMed ID: 16268246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability and measurement error of digital planimetry for the measurement of chronic venous leg ulcers.
    Stacey MC; Phillips SA; Farrokhyar F; Swaine JM
    Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Sep; 25(5):901-905. PubMed ID: 28922511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying Digital Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis: Reliability of Computer-Assisted Planimetry in Measuring Lesion Size.
    Simpson V; Hughes M; Wilkinson J; Herrick AL; Dinsdale G
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2018 Mar; 70(3):486-490. PubMed ID: 28575546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of Cranial Anthropometric Measurements in Infants with Positional Plagiocephaly.
    Pastor-Pons I; Lucha-López MO; Barrau-Lalmolda M; Rodes-Pastor I; Rodríguez-Fernández ÁL; Hidalgo-García C; Tricás-Moreno JM
    Children (Basel); 2020 Dec; 7(12):. PubMed ID: 33348822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of digital videometry and acetate tracing in measuring the surface area of cutaneous wounds.
    Wunderlich RP; Peters EJ; Armstrong DG; Lavery LA
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2000 Aug; 49(2-3):87-92. PubMed ID: 10963818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of the craniocervical posture assessment: visual and angular measurements using photographs and radiographs.
    Gadotti IC; Armijo-Olivo S; Silveira A; Magee D
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2013; 36(9):619-25. PubMed ID: 24144423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 3D photography is a reliable burn wound area assessment tool compared to digital planimetry in very young children.
    Gee Kee EL; Kimble RM; Stockton KA
    Burns; 2015 Sep; 41(6):1286-90. PubMed ID: 25716762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.