214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27590176)
21. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. BAPS 2: enhanced possibilities for the analysis of genetic population structure.
Corander J; Waldmann P; Marttinen P; Sillanpää MJ
Bioinformatics; 2004 Oct; 20(15):2363-9. PubMed ID: 15073024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A menu-driven software package of Bayesian nonparametric (and parametric) mixed models for regression analysis and density estimation.
Karabatsos G
Behav Res Methods; 2017 Feb; 49(1):335-362. PubMed ID: 26956682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. AnaCoDa: analyzing codon data with Bayesian mixture models.
Landerer C; Cope A; Zaretzki R; Gilchrist MA
Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(14):2496-2498. PubMed ID: 29522124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sensitivity to prior specification in Bayesian genome-based prediction models.
Lehermeier C; Wimmer V; Albrecht T; Auinger HJ; Gianola D; Schmid VJ; Schön CC
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Jun; 12(3):375-91. PubMed ID: 23629460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Genomic Prediction from Multiple-Trait Bayesian Regression Methods Using Mixture Priors.
Cheng H; Kizilkaya K; Zeng J; Garrick D; Fernando R
Genetics; 2018 May; 209(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 29514861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. FW: An R Package for Finlay-Wilkinson Regression that Incorporates Genomic/Pedigree Information and Covariance Structures Between Environments.
Lian L; de Los Campos G
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Dec; 6(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 26715095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An efficient exact method to obtain GBLUP and single-step GBLUP when the genomic relationship matrix is singular.
Fernando RL; Cheng H; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Oct; 48(1):80. PubMed ID: 27788669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fast genomic predictions via Bayesian G-BLUP and multilocus models of threshold traits including censored Gaussian data.
Kärkkäinen HP; Sillanpää MJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2013 Sep; 3(9):1511-23. PubMed ID: 23821618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Approximate Bayesian neural networks in genomic prediction.
Waldmann P
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):70. PubMed ID: 30577737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fast parallelized sampling of Bayesian regression models for whole-genome prediction.
Zhao T; Fernando R; Garrick D; Cheng H
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Mar; 52(1):16. PubMed ID: 32293243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. bgc: Software for Bayesian estimation of genomic clines.
Gompert Z; Buerkle CA
Mol Ecol Resour; 2012 Nov; 12(6):1168-76. PubMed ID: 22978657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Usage of an SNP-SNP Relationship Matrix for Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP) Analysis Using a Community-Based Cohort Study.
Lee YS; Kim HJ; Cho S; Kim H
Genomics Inform; 2014 Dec; 12(4):254-60. PubMed ID: 25705167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. GAPIT Version 3: Boosting Power and Accuracy for Genomic Association and Prediction.
Wang J; Zhang Z
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2021 Aug; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 34492338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. VOMBAT: prediction of transcription factor binding sites using variable order Bayesian trees.
Grau J; Ben-Gal I; Posch S; Grosse I
Nucleic Acids Res; 2006 Jul; 34(Web Server issue):W529-33. PubMed ID: 16845064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Efficient estimation and prediction for the Bayesian binary spatial model with flexible link functions.
Roy V; Evangelou E; Zhu Z
Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):289-98. PubMed ID: 26331903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Bayesian methods for genomic breeding value estimation].
Wang C; Ding X; Liu J; Yin Z; Zhang Q
Yi Chuan; 2014 Feb; 36(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 24846939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bayesian inference of fine-scale recombination rates using population genomic data.
Wang Y; Rannala B
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Dec; 363(1512):3921-30. PubMed ID: 18852101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
