BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

591 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27590331)

  • 1. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.
    van Deurzen CH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extent of ductal carcinoma in situ according to breast cancer subtypes: a population-based cohort study.
    Doebar SC; van den Broek EC; Koppert LB; Jager A; Baaijens MHA; Obdeijn IAM; van Deurzen CHM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jul; 158(1):179-187. PubMed ID: 27318854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictors of Residual Tumor in Breast-Conserving Therapy.
    Rath MG; Uhlmann L; Heil J; Domschke C; Roth Z; Sinn HP; Marme F; Scharf A; Schneeweiss A; Kieser M; Sohn C; Rom J
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S451-8. PubMed ID: 26224405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of re-excision for positive and close resection margins in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.
    Biglia N; Ponzone R; Bounous VE; Mariani LL; Maggiorotto F; Benevelli C; Liberale V; Ottino MC; Sismondi P
    Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):870-5. PubMed ID: 25305040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
    Merrill AL; Coopey SB; Tang R; McEvoy MP; Specht MC; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 26467458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. HER-2 positive breast cancer is associated with an increased risk of positive cavity margins after initial lumpectomy.
    Jia H; Jia W; Yang Y; Li S; Feng H; Liu J; Rao N; Jin L; Wu J; Gu R; Zhu L; Chen K; Deng H; Zeng Y; Liu Q; Song E; Su F
    World J Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 12():289. PubMed ID: 25241216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Langhans L; Jensen MB; Talman MM; Vejborg I; Kroman N; Tvedskov TF
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 28002557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does Mammographic Density have an Impact on the Margin Re-excision Rate After Breast-Conserving Surgery?
    Edwards BL; Guidry CA; Larson KN; Novicoff WM; Harvey JA; Schroen AT
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):782-8. PubMed ID: 26471488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Associated with Positive Resection Margins in Patients with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.
    Yoon J; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Park VY
    Korean J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 21(8):946-954. PubMed ID: 32677379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of Consensus Guidelines by the Society of Surgical Oncology and the American Society for Radiation Oncology on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery in Stages 1 and 2 Invasive Breast Cancer.
    Chung A; Gangi A; Amersi F; Bose S; Zhang X; Giuliano A
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S422-7. PubMed ID: 26310280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast conservative surgery and local recurrence.
    Rezai M; Kraemer S; Kimmig R; Kern P
    Breast; 2015 Nov; 24 Suppl 2():S100-7. PubMed ID: 26432359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinicopathological Predictors of Positive Resection Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Chauhan H; Jiwa N; Nagarajan VR; Thiruchelvam P; Hogben K; Al-Mufti R; Hadjiminas D; Shousha S; Cutress R; Ashrafian H; Takats Z; Leff DR
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):3939-3947. PubMed ID: 38520579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgeon Volume, Patient Age, and Tumor-Related Factors Influence the Need for Re-Excision After Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Hughes L; Hamm J; McGahan C; Baliski C
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):656-664. PubMed ID: 27718033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of positive resection margins in patients with non-palpable breast cancer.
    Barentsz MW; Postma EL; van Dalen T; van den Bosch MA; Miao H; Gobardhan PD; van den Hout LE; Pijnappel RM; Witkamp AJ; van Diest PJ; van Hillegersberg R; Verkooijen HM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 25228054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of intra-operative margin management techniques in breast-conserving surgery: a standardised approach reduces the likelihood of residual disease without increasing operative time.
    Bolger JC; Solon JG; Khan SA; Hill AD; Power CP
    Breast Cancer; 2015 May; 22(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 23649303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery between ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
    Choi YJ; Shin YD; Song YJ
    World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 14():126. PubMed ID: 27122132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors.
    Wijgman DJ; Ten Wolde B; van Groesen NR; Keemers-Gels ME; van den Wildenberg FJ; Strobbe LJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):665-671. PubMed ID: 28041648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Margin width is not predictive of residual disease on re-excision in breast conserving therapy.
    Hadzikadic Gusic L; McGuire KP; Ozmen T; Soran A; Thomas CR; McAuliffe PF; Diego EJ; Bonaventura M; Johnson RR; Ahrendt GM
    J Surg Oncol; 2014 Apr; 109(5):426-30. PubMed ID: 24338603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.
    Smitt MC; Horst K
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The importance of pre-operative needle core breast biopsy results on resected tissue volume, margin status, and cosmesis.
    Polat AV; Soran A; Andacoglu O; Kamali Polat A; McGuire K; Diego E; Johnson R
    J BUON; 2013; 18(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 24065470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.