275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27590368)
1. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer staging: A meta-analysis.
Chen SH; Li ZA; Huang R; Xue HQ
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 55(4):488-94. PubMed ID: 27590368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xie W; Cao D; Yang J; Shen K; Zhao L
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2016 Oct; 142(10):2173-83. PubMed ID: 27217038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis].
Li XM; Wang J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 52(3):175-183. PubMed ID: 28355689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A Meta-Analysis of Robotic Surgery in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy.
Wang J; Li X; Wu H; Zhang Y; Wang F
Dis Markers; 2020; 2020():2503753. PubMed ID: 32454902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations].
Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R
Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park DA; Lee DH; Kim SW; Lee SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1303-14. PubMed ID: 27439723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcomes in endometrial cancer care when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to robotics.
Mok ZW; Yong EL; Low JJ; Ng JS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jun; 22(5):819-25. PubMed ID: 22561178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Lee HJ; Lee YH; Chong GO; Hong DG; Lee YS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Mar; 44(3):547-555. PubMed ID: 29239059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of advanced stage endometriosis: a meta-analysis.
Chen SH; Li ZA; Du XP
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2016; 43(3):422-6. PubMed ID: 27328505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of robotic-assisted surgery outcomes with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging in Turkey.
Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Nov; 282(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 20652285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: A randomised controlled trial.
Salehi S; Åvall-Lundqvist E; Legerstam B; Carlson JW; Falconer H
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 79():81-89. PubMed ID: 28463759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of laparoscopy in staging of different gynaecological cancers.
Tse KY; Ngan HY
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Aug; 29(6):884-95. PubMed ID: 25819676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 11733973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the laparoscopic versus conventional open method for surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.
Chu LH; Chang WC; Sheu BC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 55(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 27125400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].
Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery vs conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tuoheti Z; Han L; Mulati G
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Mar; 100(12):e24908. PubMed ID: 33761649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Open, laparoscopic, and robotic ureteroneocystotomy for benign and malignant ureteral lesions: a comparison of over 100 minimally invasive cases.
Elsamra SE; Theckumparampil N; Garden B; Alom M; Waingankar N; Leavitt DA; Kreshover J; Schwartz M; Kavoussi LR; Richstone L
J Endourol; 2014 Dec; 28(12):1455-9. PubMed ID: 25390972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer.
ElSahwi KS; Hooper C; De Leon MC; Gallo TN; Ratner E; Silasi DA; Santin AD; Schwartz PE; Rutherford TJ; Azodi M
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Feb; 124(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 22036203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
