These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27590377)

  • 1. Impact of clinical audits on cesarean section rate.
    Peng FS; Lin HM; Lin HH; Tu FC; Hsiao CF; Hsiao SM
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 55(4):530-3. PubMed ID: 27590377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
    Soliman SR; Burrows RF
    CMAJ; 1993 Apr; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates.
    Robson MS; Scudamore IW; Walsh SM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jan; 174(1 Pt 1):199-205. PubMed ID: 8572006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Upcoming strategies in obstetrics: how the technology of clinical audit may reduce cesarean birth.
    Paracchini S; Masturzo B; Tangolo D; Roletti E; Piazzese A; Attini R; Rolfo A; Todros T
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Dec; 69(6):548-554. PubMed ID: 29082725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical dilation at the time of cesarean section for dystocia -- effect on subsequent trial of labor.
    Abildgaard H; Ingerslev MD; Nickelsen C; Secher NJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Feb; 92(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 23025257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of clinical audits on cesarean section rate in a Spanish hospital: Analysis of 6 year data according to the Robson classification.
    Pinto P; Crispín-Milart PH; Rojo E; Adiego B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Nov; 254():308-314. PubMed ID: 33039839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The continuing effectiveness of active management of first labor, despite a doubling in overall nulliparous cesarean delivery.
    Foley ME; Alarab M; Daly L; Keane D; Rath A; O'herlihy C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):891-5. PubMed ID: 15467560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Indicated labor induction with vaginal prostaglandin E2 increases the risk of cesarean section even in multiparous women with no previous cesarean section.
    Ben-Haroush A; Yogev Y; Bar J; Glickman H; Kaplan B; Hod M
    J Perinat Med; 2004; 32(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15008383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emergency cesarean section rate between women with gestational diabetes and normal pregnant women.
    Boriboonhirunsarn D; Waiyanikorn R
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 55(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 26927251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Induction of labor and the risk for emergency cesarean section in nulliparous and multiparous women.
    Thorsell M; Lyrenäs S; Andolf E; Kaijser M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Oct; 90(10):1094-9. PubMed ID: 21679162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.
    Zhang J; Troendle J; Reddy UM; Laughon SK; Branch DW; Burkman R; Landy HJ; Hibbard JU; Haberman S; Ramirez MM; Bailit JL; Hoffman MK; Gregory KD; Gonzalez-Quintero VH; Kominiarek M; Learman LA; Hatjis CG; van Veldhuisen P;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 203(4):326.e1-326.e10. PubMed ID: 20708166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maternal body mass index at delivery and risk of caesarean due to dystocia in low risk pregnancies.
    Roman H; Goffinet F; Hulsey TF; Newman R; Robillard PY; Hulsey TC
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 18231883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The contribution of dystocia to the cesarean section rate.
    Macara LM; Murphy KW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jul; 171(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 7794300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of early amniotomy on dystocia risk and cesarean delivery in nulliparous women: a randomized clinical trial.
    Ghafarzadeh M; Moeininasab S; Namdari M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Aug; 292(2):321-5. PubMed ID: 25666481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of dystocia-related cesarean section risk in uncomplicated Taiwanese nulliparas at term.
    Wu CH; Chen CF; Chien CC
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Nov; 288(5):1027-33. PubMed ID: 23636412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analyzing the impact of private service on the cesarean section rate in public hospital Thailand.
    Phadungkiatwattana P; Tongsakul N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Dec; 284(6):1375-9. PubMed ID: 21359844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When is fetal macrosomia (> or = 4500 g) an indication for caesarean section?
    Mikulandra F; Perisa M; Stojnić E
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(8):441-7. PubMed ID: 8794545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of a clinical practice guideline on physician compliance.
    Suwanrath-Kengpol C; Pinjaroen S; Krisanapan O; Petmanee P
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2004 Aug; 16(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 15252007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length.
    Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 May; 17(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 16147844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.