These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27590570)

  • 1. Factors Associated With Hemostatic Agent Use During Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
    Kakos A; Allen V; Whiteside J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1167-1171. PubMed ID: 27590570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
    Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of power morcellator removal on hysterectomy practice patterns.
    Wesol A; Woolley S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():41-44. PubMed ID: 28599164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.
    Lönnerfors C; Reynisson P; Persson J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 25045857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inpatient Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in the United States: Trends and Factors Associated With Approach Selection.
    Desai VB; Guo XM; Fan L; Wright JD; Xu X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):151-158.e1. PubMed ID: 27614151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications-surgical volume matters: a retrospective cohort study comparing complications of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomies.
    Baracy MG; Martinez M; Hagglund K; Afzal F; Kulkarni S; Corey L; Aslam MF
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1199-1207. PubMed ID: 34981444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN; Dauterive FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
    Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of robotic surgery on hysterectomy trends: implications for resident education.
    Yamasato K; Casey D; Kaneshiro B; Hiraoka M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 24172026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postoperative Pain Scores and Narcotic Use in Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Staging.
    Turner TB; Habib AS; Broadwater G; Valea FA; Fleming ND; Ehrisman JA; Di Santo N; Havrilesky LJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1004-10. PubMed ID: 25967934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized controlled trial comparing operative times between standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Deimling TA; Eldridge JL; Riley KA; Kunselman AR; Harkins GJ
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jan; 136(1):64-69. PubMed ID: 28099699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictors of Overnight Admission after Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy in the Expert Setting.
    Moawad G; Tyan P; Vargas V; Park D; Young H; Marfori C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 26(1):122-128. PubMed ID: 29723642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rate of Urologic Injury with Robotic Hysterectomy.
    Petersen SS; Doe S; Rubinfeld I; Davydova Y; Buekers T; Sangha R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):867-871. PubMed ID: 29337210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Morcellation Techniques at the Time of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.
    Meurs EAIM; Brito LG; Ajao MO; Goggins ER; Vitonis AF; Einarsson JI; Cohen SL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):843-849. PubMed ID: 28483536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abdominal Hysterectomy: Reduced Risk of Surgical Site Infection Associated with Robotic and Laparoscopic Technique.
    Colling KP; Glover JK; Statz CA; Geller MA; Beilman GJ
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2015 Oct; 16(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 26070101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Classification of Postoperative Complications in Robotic-assisted Compared With Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.
    Barrie A; Freeman AH; Lyon L; Garcia C; Conell C; Abbott LH; Littell RD; Powell CB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1181-1188. PubMed ID: 27621195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Progressive reduction in abdominal hysterectomy rates: impact of laparoscopy, robotics and surgeon factors.
    Moen M; Noone M; Cholkeri-Singh A; Vassallo B; Locker B; Miller C
    J Robot Surg; 2014 Mar; 8(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 27637233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discharge Readiness after Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
    DeStephano CC; Gajarawala SP; Espinal M; Heckman MG; Vargas ER; Robertson MA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):910-918. PubMed ID: 30240901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.