These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27591050)
1. Risk factors for robotic gynecologic procedures requiring conversion to other surgical procedures. Unger CA; Lachiewicz MP; Ridgeway B Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Dec; 135(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 27591050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus. Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk Factors and Outcomes for Conversion to Laparotomy of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecology. Lim CS; Mowers EL; Mahnert N; Skinner BD; Kamdar N; Morgan DM; As-Sanie S Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 128(6):1295-1305. PubMed ID: 27824755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease. Bastawrous AL; Landmann RG; Liu Y; Liu E; Cleary RK Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):598-609. PubMed ID: 31062152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implementing robotic surgery to gynecologic oncology: the first 300 operations performed at a tertiary hospital. Mäenpää M; Nieminen K; Tomás E; Luukkaala T; Mäenpää JU Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 May; 94(5):482-8. PubMed ID: 25721212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery according to case type: a 6-year retrospective cohort study using Clavien-Dindo classification. Wechter ME; Mohd J; Magrina JF; Cornella JL; Magtibay PM; Wilson JR; Kho RM J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):844-50. PubMed ID: 24699301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of 30-day readmission following hysterectomy for benign and malignant indications at a tertiary care academic medical center. Lee MS; Venkatesh KK; Growdon WB; Ecker JL; York-Best CM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):607.e1-607.e12. PubMed ID: 26704895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of age on surgical staging and approaches (laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery) in endometrial cancer management. Bourgin C; Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Foucher F; Levêque J; Lavoué V Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):703-709. PubMed ID: 27955835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery and Perioperative Morbidity in Elderly Women. Krause AK; Muntz HG; McGonigle KF J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 27287246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications. Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. When Partial Nephrectomy is Unsuccessful: Understanding the Reasons for Conversion from Robotic Partial to Radical Nephrectomy at a Tertiary Referral Center. Kara Ö; Maurice MJ; Mouracade P; Malkoç E; Dagenais J; Nelson RJ; Chavali JSS; Stein RJ; Fergany A; Kaouk JH J Urol; 2017 Jul; 198(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 28087299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of conversions and complications. Cusimano MC; Simpson AN; Dossa F; Liani V; Kaur Y; Acuna SA; Robertson D; Satkunaratnam A; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Baxter NN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 221(5):410-428.e19. PubMed ID: 31082383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complications of Robotic Gynecologic Surgery in the Severely Morbidly Obese. Cosin JA; Brett Sutherland MA; Westgate CT; Fang H Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Nov; 23(12):4035-4041. PubMed ID: 27334223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Body mass index, conversion rate and complications among patients undergoing robotic surgery for endometrial carcinoma. Cunningham MJ; Dorzin E; Nguyen L; Anderson E; Bunn WD J Robot Surg; 2015 Dec; 9(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 26530848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. Scheib SA; Fader AN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk of venous thromboembolism in abdominal versus minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign conditions. Barber EL; Neubauer NL; Gossett DR Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):609.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25511239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies. Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]