377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27591715)
21. Assessing lateral uterine wall defects and residual myometrial thickness after cesarean section.
Al Naimi A; Mouzakiti N; Wolnicki B; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Mar; 258():391-395. PubMed ID: 33540191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after elective second cesarean section.
Tekelioğlu M; Karataş S; Güralp O; Murat Alınca C; Ender Yumru A; Tuğ N
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Mar; 34(6):943-947. PubMed ID: 31146610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cesarean scar thickness in non-pregnant women as a risk factor for uterine rupture.
Risager JK; Uldbjerg N; Glavind J
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jan; 35(2):389-394. PubMed ID: 31992102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Anatomy of the sonographic post-cesarean uterus.
Al Naimi A; Wolnicki B; Mouzakiti N; Reinbach T; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Dec; 304(6):1485-1491. PubMed ID: 33891206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure.
Hanacek J; Vojtech J; Urbankova I; Krcmar M; Křepelka P; Feyereisl J; Krofta L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Jan; 99(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 31441500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effect of the onset of labor on the characteristics of the cesarean scar.
Al Naimi A; Jennewein L; Mouzakiti N; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 May; 157(2):322-326. PubMed ID: 34077556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Changes in uterine flexion caused by cesarean section: correlation between post-flexion and deficient cesarean section scars.
Ryo E; Sakurai R; Kamata H; Seto M; Morita M; Ayabe T
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2016 Apr; 43(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 27033868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Position and integrity of uterine scar are determined by degree of cervical dilatation at time of Cesarean section.
Kamel R; Eissa T; Sharaf M; Negm S; Thilaganathan B
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):466-470. PubMed ID: 32330331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sonographic assessment of post-cesarean section uterine scar in pregnant women.
Markovitch O; Tepper R; Hershkovitz R
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jan; 26(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 22928532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Di Spiezio Sardo A; Saccone G; McCurdy R; Bujold E; Bifulco G; Berghella V
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):578-583. PubMed ID: 28070914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review.
Jastrow N; Chaillet N; Roberge S; Morency AM; Lacasse Y; Bujold E
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):321-327. PubMed ID: 20500938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Hysterotomy level at Cesarean section and occurrence of large scar defects: a randomized single-blind trial.
Vikhareva O; Rickle GS; Lavesson T; Nedopekina E; Brandell K; Salvesen KÅ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):438-442. PubMed ID: 30484920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure.
Hamar BD; Saber SB; Cackovic M; Magloire LK; Pettker CM; Abdel-Razeq SS; Rosenberg VA; Buhimschi IA; Buhimschi CS
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):808-13. PubMed ID: 17906013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section.
Vikhareva Osser O; Valentin L
BJOG; 2010 Aug; 117(9):1119-26. PubMed ID: 20604776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: Is it preventable?
Yazicioglu F; Gökdogan A; Kelekci S; Aygün M; Savan K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jan; 124(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 16023780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Can the final sonographic assessment of the cesarean section scar be predicted 6 weeks after the operation?
Dosedla E; Calda P
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 55(5):718-720. PubMed ID: 27751422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ultrasound Predictability of Lower Uterine Segment Cesarean Section Scar Thickness.
Tazion S; Hafeez M; Manzoor R; Rana T
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2018 May; 28(5):361-364. PubMed ID: 29690964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Laparoscopic Repair of Cesarean Scar Defect "Isthmocele".
Urman B; Arslan T; Aksu S; Taskiran C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):857-8. PubMed ID: 27006058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Visibility and measurement of cesarean section scars in pregnancy: a reproducibility study.
Naji O; Daemen A; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Saso S; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Nov; 40(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 22323065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after cesarean section: is it preventable by intraoperative digital dilatation of the internal cervical ostium?
Yazicioglu HF; Sevket O; Ekin M; Ozyurt O; Aygun M
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2012; 74(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 22832395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
