These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
28. What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be? II. Morrison GS Sci Justice; 2017 Nov; 57(6):472-476. PubMed ID: 29173462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Collaborative study of speaker identiication by the voiceprint method. Smrkovski LL J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1975 May; 58(3):453-6. PubMed ID: 1141171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. INTERPOL survey of the use of speaker identification by law enforcement agencies. Morrison GS; Sahito FH; Jardine G; Djokic D; Clavet S; Berghs S; Goemans Dorny C Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jun; 263():92-100. PubMed ID: 27100858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Speaker identification in courtroom contexts - Part II: Investigation of bias in individual listeners' responses. Basu N; Weber P; Bali AS; Rosas-Aguilar C; Edmond G; Martire KA; Morrison GS Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Aug; 349():111768. PubMed ID: 37392611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Calibration of score based likelihood ratio estimation in automated forensic facial image comparison. Rodriguez AM; Geradts Z; Worring M Forensic Sci Int; 2022 May; 334():111239. PubMed ID: 35364422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Applying virtual reality in forensics - a virtual scene walkthrough. Sieberth T; Dobay A; Affolter R; Ebert LC Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2019 Mar; 15(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 30519987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A test of the effectiveness of speaker verification for differentiating between identical twins. Ariyaeeinia A; Morrison C; Malegaonkar A; Black S Sci Justice; 2008 Dec; 48(4):182-6. PubMed ID: 19192680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of language mismatch in automatic forensic voice comparison using deep learning embeddings. Sztahó D; Fejes A J Forensic Sci; 2023 May; 68(3):871-883. PubMed ID: 36999742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Bayesian networks for evaluation of evidence from forensic entomology. Andersson MG; Sundström A; Lindström A Biosecur Bioterror; 2013 Sep; 11 Suppl 1():S64-77. PubMed ID: 23971824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An Approach to Speaker Identification. Hollien H J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):334-344. PubMed ID: 27404606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Using subsampling to estimate the strength of handwriting evidence via score-based likelihood ratios. Davis LJ; Saunders CP; Hepler A; Buscaglia J Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Mar; 216(1-3):146-57. PubMed ID: 22018850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Telephone Transmission and Earwitnesses: Performance on Voice Parades Controlled for Voice Similarity. McDougall K; Nolan F; Hudson T Phonetica; 2015; 72(4):257-72. PubMed ID: 26633169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Forensic science. Journal flinches as article on voice analyzer sparks lawsuit threat. Cho A Science; 2009 Feb; 323(5916):863. PubMed ID: 19213884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]