146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27592216)
1. Automated Measurement of the Angle of Progression in Labor: A Feasibility and Reliability Study.
Youssef A; Salsi G; Montaguti E; Bellussi F; Pacella G; Azzarone C; Farina A; Rizzo N; Pilu G
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2017; 41(4):293-299. PubMed ID: 27592216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated 3D ultrasound measurement of the angle of progression in labor.
Montaguti E; Rizzo N; Pilu G; Youssef A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Jan; 31(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 28043183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breech progression angle: new feasible and reliable transperineal ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal breech descent in birth canal.
Youssef A; Brunelli E; Fiorentini M; Lenzi J; Pilu G; El-Balat A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 58(4):609-615. PubMed ID: 33847431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of different methods of measuring angle of progression in prediction of labor outcome.
Frick A; Kostiv V; Vojtassakova D; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 31692170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic ultrasound technique to measure angle of progression during labor.
Conversano F; Peccarisi M; Pisani P; Di Paola M; De Marco T; Franchini R; Greco A; D'Ambrogio G; Casciaro S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 50(6):766-775. PubMed ID: 28233418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods for assessment of fetal head-symphysis distance in active labor.
Youssef A; Bellussi F; Montaguti E; Maroni E; Salsi G; Morselli-Labate AM; Paccapelo A; Rizzo N; Pilu G; Ghi T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 43(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 24006290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of fetal head descent using the 'angle of progression' on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise.
Dückelmann AM; Bamberg C; Michaelis SA; Lange J; Nonnenmacher A; Dudenhausen JW; Kalache KD
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Feb; 35(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 20069668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New technique for automatic sonographic measurement of change in head-perineum distance and angle of progression during active phase of second stage of labor.
Angeli L; Conversano F; Dall'Asta A; Volpe N; Simone M; Di Pasquo E; Pignatelli D; Schera GBL; Di Paola M; Ricciardi P; Ferretti A; Frusca T; Casciaro S; Ghi T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 56(4):597-602. PubMed ID: 31909525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What is the most reliable ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal head descent?
Molina FS; Terra R; Carrillo MP; Puertas A; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 36(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20533441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fetal head-symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in labor.
Youssef A; Maroni E; Ragusa A; De Musso F; Salsi G; Iammarino MT; Paccapelo A; Rizzo N; Pilu G; Ghi T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 23124698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intra and interobserver variability of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurements with contraction and pushing.
Sainz JA; Fernández-Palacín A; Borrero C; Aquise A; Ramos Z; García-Mejido JA
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Apr; 38(3):333-338. PubMed ID: 29022481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of transperineal ultrasound for the assessment of the angle of progression in labor using parasagittal approach versus midsagittal approach.
Kamel R; Negm S; Montaguti E; Dodaro MG; Brunelli E; Di Donna G; Soliman E; Sharaf MF; ElHarty AS; Youssef A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Oct; 34(19):3175-3180. PubMed ID: 31640437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computed tomographic study of anatomical relationship between pubic symphysis and ischial spines to improve interpretation of intrapartum translabial ultrasound.
Arthuis CJ; Perrotin F; Patat F; Brunereau L; Simon EG
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 48(6):779-785. PubMed ID: 26678354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods in assessing fetal head descent in the first stage of labor.
Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; Eggebø TM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 21630362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery.
Ghi T; Maroni E; Youssef A; Morselli-Labate AM; Paccapelo A; Montaguti E; Rizzo N; Pilu G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 24496823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multitask Deep Neural Network for the Fully Automatic Measurement of the Angle of Progression.
Lu Y; Zhi D; Zhou M; Lai F; Chen G; Ou Z; Zeng R; Long S; Qiu R; Zhou M; Jiang X; Wang H; Bai J
Comput Math Methods Med; 2022; 2022():5192338. PubMed ID: 36092792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pre-Induction Transperineal Ultrasound Assessment for the Prediction of Labor Outcome.
Chan WWY; Chaemsaithong P; Lim WT; Tse AWT; Kwan AHW; Leung TY; Sahota DS; Poon LC
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2019; 45(4):256-267. PubMed ID: 30121653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of selected ultrasonography parameters in the second stage of labor in prediction mode of delivery.
Ciaciura-Jarno M; Cnota W; Wójtowicz D; Niesłuchowska-Hoxha A; Ruci A; Kierach R; Stępień A; Nowak A; Sodowska P
Ginekol Pol; 2016; 87(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 27418223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional ultrasound in monitoring progression of labor: a reproducibility study.
Ghi T; Contro E; Farina A; Nobile M; Pilu G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 36(4):500-6. PubMed ID: 20652931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound.
Barbera AF; Pombar X; Perugino G; Lezotte DC; Hobbins JC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 19248000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
