These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27592216)

  • 41. Reproducibility of fetal renal pelvis volume assessed by three-dimensional ultrasonography with two different measurement techniques.
    Duin LK; Willekes C; Vossen M; Offermans J; Nijhuis JG
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 May; 41(4):230-4. PubMed ID: 23325421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Objective diagnosis of arrested labor on transperineal ultrasound.
    Nishimura K; Yoshimura K; Kubo T; Hachisuga T
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Jul; 42(7):803-9. PubMed ID: 27074875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound as a predictor of instrumentation difficulty with vacuum-assisted delivery in primiparous women.
    Sainz JA; Borrero C; Fernández-Palacín A; Aquise A; Valdivieso P; Pastor L; Garrido R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015; 28(17):2041-7. PubMed ID: 25327175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery?
    Kalache KD; Dückelmann AM; Michaelis SA; Lange J; Cichon G; Dudenhausen JW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 19224527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dynamic changes of fetal head descent at term before the onset of labor correlate with labor outcome and can be improved by ultrasound visual feedback.
    Youssef A; Dodaro MG; Montaguti E; Consolini S; Ciarlariello S; Farina A; Bellussi F; Rizzo N; Pilu G
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Jun; 34(12):1847-1854. PubMed ID: 31394944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Automatic measurement of head-perineum distance during intrapartum ultrasound: description of the technique and preliminary results.
    Angeli L; Conversano F; Dall'Asta A; Eggebø T; Volpe N; Marta S; Pisani P; Casciaro S; Di Paola M; Frusca T; Ghi T
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jul; 35(14):2759-2764. PubMed ID: 32727248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Intrapartum Translabial Ultrasound: A Systematic Analysis of The Fetal Head Station in The First Stage of Labor].
    Kohls F; Brodowski L; Kuehnle E; Kniebusch N; Kalache KD; Weichert A
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2018 Feb; 222(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 29245158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Intra- and interoperator reliability of manual and semi-automated measurements of intracranial translucency.
    Karl K; Kagan KO; Chaoui R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 39(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 22081521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Sonographic cervical length measurement in pregnant women with a cervical pessary.
    Goya M; Pratcorona L; Higueras T; Perez-Hoyos S; Carreras E; Cabero L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 21305638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Embryo volume measurement: an intraobserver, intermethod comparative study of semiautomated and manual three-dimensional ultrasound techniques.
    Sur SD; Clewes JS; Campbell BK; Raine-Fenning NJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Nov; 38(5):516-23. PubMed ID: 21793080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Ultrasound in labor: impact of a theoretical and practical course on caregiver's perspective and accuracy.
    Youssef A; Kamel R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Sep; 33(18):3163-3169. PubMed ID: 30700229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Role of 'angle of progression' in prediction of delivery mode.
    Marsoosi V; Pirjani R; Mansouri B; Eslamian L; Jamal A; Heidari R; Rahimi-Foroushani A
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1693-9. PubMed ID: 26370603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Prediction of time to delivery by transperineal ultrasound in second stage of labor.
    Yonetani N; Yamamoto R; Murata M; Nakajima E; Taguchi T; Ishii K; Mitsuda N
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 49(2):246-251. PubMed ID: 27089836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Prediction of labor outcome using serial transperineal ultrasound in the first stage of labor.
    Chor CM; Poon LCY; Leung TY
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Jan; 32(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 28819985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The sonopartogram: a novel method for recording progress of labor by ultrasound.
    Hassan WA; Eggebø T; Ferguson M; Gillett A; Studd J; Pasupathy D; Lees CC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 43(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 24105734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Correlation between clinical fetal head station and sonographic angle of progression during the second stage of labor.
    Perlman S; Kivilevitch Z; Moran O; Katorza E; Kees S; Achiron R; Gilboa Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Nov; 31(21):2905-2910. PubMed ID: 28738718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of the labour process with serial transperineal ultrasonography and prediction of the type of birth.
    Bulut AN; Ceyhan V
    J Perinat Med; 2020 Sep; 49(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 32892180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reproducibility and acceptability of ultrasound measurements of head-perineum distance.
    Benediktsdottir S; Salvesen KÅ; Hjartardottir H; Eggebø TM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Jan; 97(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 29068541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Transperineal ultrasonography for labor management: accuracy and reliability.
    Yuce T; Kalafat E; Koc A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jul; 94(7):760-765. PubMed ID: 25846302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reliability of new three-dimensional ultrasound technique for pelvic hiatal area measurement.
    Youssef A; Montaguti E; Sanlorenzo O; Cariello L; Salsi G; Morganelli G; Azzarone C; Pilu G; Rizzo N
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 47(5):629-35. PubMed ID: 26105710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.