These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27592412)

  • 1. Inferring mass in complex scenes by mental simulation.
    Hamrick JB; Battaglia PW; Griffiths TL; Tenenbaum JB
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():61-76. PubMed ID: 27592412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning physical parameters from dynamic scenes.
    Ullman TD; Stuhlmüller A; Goodman ND; Tenenbaum JB
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Aug; 104():57-82. PubMed ID: 29653395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects.
    Sanborn AN; Mansinghka VK; Griffiths TL
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Apr; 120(2):411-37. PubMed ID: 23458084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding.
    Battaglia PW; Hamrick JB; Tenenbaum JB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Nov; 110(45):18327-32. PubMed ID: 24145417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intuitive physical reasoning about objects' masses transfers to a visuomotor decision task consistent with Newtonian physics.
    Neupärtl N; Tatai F; Rothkopf CA
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Oct; 16(10):e1007730. PubMed ID: 33075051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning abstract visual concepts via probabilistic program induction in a Language of Thought.
    Overlan MC; Jacobs RA; Piantadosi ST
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():320-334. PubMed ID: 28772189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Normality and actual causal strength.
    Icard TF; Kominsky JF; Knobe J
    Cognition; 2017 Apr; 161():80-93. PubMed ID: 28157584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Partial mental simulation explains fallacies in physical reasoning.
    Bass I; Smith KA; Bonawitz E; Ullman TD
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2021; 38(7-8):413-424. PubMed ID: 35654749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analogical and category-based inference: a theoretical integration with Bayesian causal models.
    Holyoak KJ; Lee HS; Lu H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Nov; 139(4):702-27. PubMed ID: 21038985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.
    Krynski TR; Tenenbaum JB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 17696692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do people reason rationally about causally related events? Markov violations, weak inferences, and failures of explaining away.
    Rottman BM; Hastie R
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Jun; 87():88-134. PubMed ID: 27261539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feature inference with uncertain categorization: Re-assessing Anderson's rational model.
    Konovalova E; Le Mens G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1666-1681. PubMed ID: 28924732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Win-Stay, Lose-Sample: a simple sequential algorithm for approximating Bayesian inference.
    Bonawitz E; Denison S; Gopnik A; Griffiths TL
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Nov; 74():35-65. PubMed ID: 25086501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing Bayesian and heuristic predictions of mass judgments of colliding objects.
    Sanborn AN
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():938. PubMed ID: 25206345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A decision network account of reasoning about other people's choices.
    Jern A; Kemp C
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():12-38. PubMed ID: 26010559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do striking biases in mass inference reflect a flawed mental model of physics?
    Mitko A; Fischer J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Sep; 152(9):2636-2650. PubMed ID: 37141007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physical imagery: kinematic versus dynamic models.
    Schwartz DL
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 May; 38(3):433-64. PubMed ID: 10328859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inferring learners' knowledge from their actions.
    Rafferty AN; LaMar MM; Griffiths TL
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Apr; 39(3):584-618. PubMed ID: 25155381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structured statistical models of inductive reasoning.
    Kemp C; Tenenbaum JB
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):20-58. PubMed ID: 19159147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why do categories affect stimulus judgment?
    Huttenlocher J; Hedges LV; Vevea JL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2000 Jun; 129(2):220-41. PubMed ID: 10868335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.