These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27592823)

  • 21. Running quietly reduces ground reaction force and vertical loading rate and alters foot strike technique.
    Phan X; Grisbrook TL; Wernli K; Stearne SM; Davey P; Ng L
    J Sports Sci; 2017 Aug; 35(16):1636-1642. PubMed ID: 27594087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A kinematics and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill running.
    Riley PO; Dicharry J; Franz J; Della Croce U; Wilder RP; Kerrigan DC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 Jun; 40(6):1093-100. PubMed ID: 18460996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Changing Sagittal-Plane Landing Styles to Modulate Impact and Tibiofemoral Force Magnitude and Directions Relative to the Tibia.
    Shimokochi Y; Ambegaonkar JP; Meyer EG
    J Athl Train; 2016 Sep; 51(9):669-681. PubMed ID: 27723362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of foot orthoses on magnitude and timing of rearfoot and tibial motions, ground reaction force and knee moment during running.
    Eslami M; Begon M; Hinse S; Sadeghi H; Popov P; Allard P
    J Sci Med Sport; 2009 Nov; 12(6):679-84. PubMed ID: 18768360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Body armour: the effect of load, exercise and distraction on landing forces.
    Dempsey PC; Handcock PJ; Rehrer NJ
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 24050682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Listening to music while running alters ground reaction forces: a study of acute exposure to varying speed and loudness levels in young women and men.
    Manca A; Cugusi L; Pomidori L; Felisatti M; Altavilla G; Zocca E; Zocca M; Bussu F; Dvir Z; Deriu F
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2020 Jun; 120(6):1391-1401. PubMed ID: 32277258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of negative joint work and vertical ground reaction force loading rates in Chi runners and rearfoot-striking runners.
    Goss DL; Gross MT
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2013 Oct; 43(10):685-92. PubMed ID: 24256170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The role of footwear-independent variations in rearfoot movement on impact attenuation in heel-toe running.
    Kersting UG; Kriwet A; Brüggemann GP
    Res Sports Med; 2006; 14(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 16869137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ground reaction force metrics are not strongly correlated with tibial bone load when running across speeds and slopes: Implications for science, sport and wearable tech.
    Matijevich ES; Branscombe LM; Scott LR; Zelik KE
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210000. PubMed ID: 30653510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Joint kinematics and ground reaction forces in overground versus treadmill graded running.
    Firminger CR; Vernillo G; Savoldelli A; Stefanyshyn DJ; Millet GY; Edwards WB
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():109-113. PubMed ID: 29729612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ground reaction forces during sprint hurdles.
    Nagahara R; Wakamiya M; Shinohara Y; Nagano A
    J Sports Sci; 2021 Dec; 39(23):2706-2715. PubMed ID: 34313537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantifying plyometric intensity via rate of force development, knee joint, and ground reaction forces.
    Jensen RL; Ebben WP
    J Strength Cond Res; 2007 Aug; 21(3):763-7. PubMed ID: 17685678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Understanding the track and field sprint start through a functional analysis of the external force features which contribute to higher levels of block phase performance.
    Bezodis NE; Walton SP; Nagahara R
    J Sports Sci; 2019 Mar; 37(5):560-567. PubMed ID: 30306822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of strength on plant foot kinetics and kinematics during a change of direction task.
    Spiteri T; Cochrane JL; Hart NH; Haff GG; Nimphius S
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2013; 13(6):646-52. PubMed ID: 24251742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Landing ground reaction forces in figure skaters and non-skaters.
    Saunders NW; Hanson N; Koutakis P; Chaudhari AM; Devor ST
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(11):1042-9. PubMed ID: 24479611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of different playing surfaces on the biomechanics of a tennis running forehand foot plant.
    Stiles VH; Dixon SJ
    J Appl Biomech; 2006 Feb; 22(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16760563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Primary mechanical factors contributing to foot eversion moment during the stance phase of running.
    Tsujimoto N; Nunome H; Ikegami Y
    J Sports Sci; 2017 May; 35(9):898-905. PubMed ID: 27362583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of hurdling step strategy on the kinematics of the block start.
    Rowley LJ; Churchill SM; Dunn M; Wheat J
    Sports Biomech; 2024 Jul; 23(7):846-859. PubMed ID: 33821749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relationship between vertical ground reaction force and speed during walking, slow jogging, and running.
    Keller TS; Weisberger AM; Ray JL; Hasan SS; Shiavi RG; Spengler DM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1996 Jul; 11(5):253-259. PubMed ID: 11415629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Frontal plane landing mechanics in high-arched compared with low-arched female athletes.
    Powell DW; Hanson NJ; Long B; Williams DS
    Clin J Sport Med; 2012 Sep; 22(5):430-5. PubMed ID: 22584960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.