These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27593688)
1. Segmentation and three-dimensional reconstruction of lesions using the automated breast volume scanner (ABVS). Araújo T; Abayazid M; Rutten MJCM; Misra S Int J Med Robot; 2017 Sep; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 27593688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound. Lin X; Wang J; Han F; Fu J; Li A Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21420814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel application of the Automated Breast Volume Scanner (ABVS) in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors. Chen T; Gao H; Guo W; Qing X; Gao K; Yu J; Deng Y Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 25667066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic needle segmentation in three-dimensional ultrasound images using two orthogonal two-dimensional image projections. Ding M; Cardinal HN; Fenster A Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):222-34. PubMed ID: 12607840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3-D Single Breath-Hold Shear Strain Estimation for Improved Breast Lesion Detection and Classification in Automated Volumetric Ultrasound Scanners. Hendriks GAGM; Chen C; Hansen HHG; de Korte CL IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Sep; 65(9):1590-1599. PubMed ID: 29994473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Segmentation of malignant lesions in 3D breast ultrasound using a depth-dependent model. Tan T; Gubern-Mérida A; Borelli C; Manniesing R; van Zelst J; Wang L; Zhang W; Platel B; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4074. PubMed ID: 27370126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. LECANDUS study (LEsion CANdidate Detection in UltraSound Data): evaluation of image analysis algorithms for breast lesion detection in volume ultrasound data. Golatta M; Zeegers D; Filippatos K; Binder LL; Scharf A; Rauch G; Rom J; Schütz F; Sohn C; Heil J Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Aug; 294(2):423-8. PubMed ID: 27236704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver reliability of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) interpretation and agreement of ABVS findings with hand held breast ultrasound (HHUS), mammography and pathology results. Golatta M; Franz D; Harcos A; Junkermann H; Rauch G; Scharf A; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Heil J Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):e332-6. PubMed ID: 23540947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of automated breast 3-D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses. Chen L; Chen Y; Diao XH; Fang L; Pang Y; Cheng AQ; Li WP; Wang Y Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1735-42. PubMed ID: 23849390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lesion Segmentation in Automated 3D Breast Ultrasound: Volumetric Analysis. Agarwal R; Diaz O; Lladó X; Gubern-Mérida A; Vilanova JC; Martí R Ultrason Imaging; 2018 Mar; 40(2):97-112. PubMed ID: 29182056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver agreement for sonograms of breast lesions obtained by an automated breast volume scanner. Zhang J; Lai XJ; Zhu QL; Wang HY; Jiang YX; Liu H; Dai Q; You SS; Xiao MS; Sun Q Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2179-83. PubMed ID: 21724355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combining low-, high-level and empirical domain knowledge for automated segmentation of ultrasonic breast lesions. Madabhushi A; Metaxas DN IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12715992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A qualitative and quantitative interaction technique for freehand 3D ultrasound imaging. Dai Y; Tian J; Xue J; Liu J Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2750-3. PubMed ID: 17945735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of an automated breast volume ultrasound system for assessment of the pre-operative extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: comparison with a conventional handheld ultrasound examination. Li N; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Yang Q; Wang HY; Lai XJ; Sun Q Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2255-63. PubMed ID: 24035630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional ultrasonography of the breast; An adequate replacement for MRI in neoadjuvant chemotherapy tumour response evaluation? - RESPONDER trial. van Egdom LSE; Lagendijk M; Heijkoop EHM; Koning AHJ; van Deurzen CHM; Jager A; van Lankeren W; Koppert LB Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 104():94-100. PubMed ID: 29857873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a portable 3D ultrasound imaging system for musculoskeletal tissues. Huang QH; Zheng YP; Lu MH; Chi ZR Ultrasonics; 2005 Jan; 43(3):153-63. PubMed ID: 15556650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a novel robot-assisted 3DUS system for real-time planning and guidance of breast interstitial HDR brachytherapy. Poulin E; Gardi L; Barker K; Montreuil J; Fenster A; Beaulieu L Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6830-9. PubMed ID: 26632040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical breast ultrasound image segmentation by machine learning. Xu Y; Wang Y; Yuan J; Cheng Q; Wang X; Carson PL Ultrasonics; 2019 Jan; 91():1-9. PubMed ID: 30029074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mass Segmentation in Automated 3-D Breast Ultrasound Using Adaptive Region Growing and Supervised Edge-Based Deformable Model. Kozegar E; Soryani M; Behnam H; Salamati M; Tan T IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 Apr; 37(4):918-928. PubMed ID: 29610071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of handheld ultrasound and automated breast ultrasound in women recalled after mammography screening. Hellgren R; Dickman P; Leifland K; Saracco A; Hall P; Celebioglu F Acta Radiol; 2017 May; 58(5):515-520. PubMed ID: 27565633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]