These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27594079)
21. Article review process. Burr G Confed Aust Crit Care Nurses J; 1991 Sep; 4(3):17. PubMed ID: 1912646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Advancing the peer review process: a multifaceted approach to improving quality. Jenkins JA; Gordon AJ Subst Abus; 2014; 35(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 24580113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Am I flogging a dead metaphor? Sloppy scholarship and the implied spider. McKenzie R J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2005 Oct; 12(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 16164505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Problems with peer review and alternatives. Smith R Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1988 Mar; 296(6624):774-7. PubMed ID: 3126969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Peer Review of Peer Review: Somewhere Over the Rainbow. O'Connor CM JACC Heart Fail; 2016 Nov; 4(11):907-908. PubMed ID: 27810082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Information for peer reviewers. Huston P CMAJ; 1994 Apr; 150(8):1211-22. PubMed ID: 8162544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [The manuscripts' review process in Revista Médica de Chile and its peer-reviewers during the year 2012]. Reyes B H; Andresen H M; Palma H J Rev Med Chil; 2013 Jul; 141(7):903-8. PubMed ID: 24356739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Next steps in reforming the PCRJ's peer review process. Sheikh A; Stephenson P Prim Care Respir J; 2011 Dec; 20(4):347-8. PubMed ID: 22124785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Peer review under the microscope: an editor's view. Chan DL J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2011 Oct; 21(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 22316192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]