302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27594099)
21. An analysis of the impact of auditory-nerve adaptation on behavioral measures of temporal integration in cochlear implant recipients.
Hay-McCutcheon MJ; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2444-57. PubMed ID: 16266166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Recovery characteristics of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve in deafened guinea pigs: relation to neuronal status.
Ramekers D; Versnel H; Strahl SB; Klis SF; Grolman W
Hear Res; 2015 Mar; 321():12-24. PubMed ID: 25582354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Phenomenological model of auditory nerve population responses to cochlear implant stimulation.
Tabibi S; Boulet J; Dillier N; Bruce IC
J Neurosci Methods; 2021 Jul; 358():109212. PubMed ID: 33957156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Stochastic information transfer from cochlear implant electrodes to auditory nerve fibers.
Gao X; Grayden DB; McDonnell MD
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Aug; 90(2):022722. PubMed ID: 25215773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The dependence of auditory nerve rate adaptation on electric stimulus parameters, electrode position, and fiber diameter: a computer model study.
Woo J; Miller CA; Abbas PJ
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 11(2):283-96. PubMed ID: 20033248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Temporal Response Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Implanted Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder and Implanted Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
He S; Abbas PJ; Doyle DV; McFayden TC; Mulherin S
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):397-411. PubMed ID: 26655913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantifying envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory nerve responses to chimaeric speech.
Heinz MG; Swaminathan J
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 10(3):407-23. PubMed ID: 19365691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of response properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve reported in human listeners and in animal models.
Skidmore J; Ramekers D; Bruce IC; He S
Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108643. PubMed ID: 36343534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Recording and analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) with MED-EL cochlear implants and different artifact reduction strategies in Matlab.
Bahmer A; Peter O; Baumann U
J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Aug; 191(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 20558202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Analysis of a purely conductance-based stochastic nerve fibre model as applied to compound models of populations of human auditory nerve fibres used in cochlear implant simulations.
Badenhorst W; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
Biol Cybern; 2017 Dec; 111(5-6):439-458. PubMed ID: 29063191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Response of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation: effects of high-rate pulse trains.
Runge-Samuelson CL; Abbas PJ; Rubinstein JT; Miller CA; Robinson BK
Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 15276671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Encoding and decoding amplitude-modulated cochlear implant stimuli--a point process analysis.
Goldwyn JH; Shea-Brown E; Rubinstein JT
J Comput Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 28(3):405-24. PubMed ID: 20177761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users].
Zhu X; Cao K; Pan T; Yang H; Wang Y
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 16(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11944479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Predicting dynamic range and intensity discrimination for electrical pulse-train stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: the effects of stimulus noise.
Xu Y; Collins LM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jun; 52(6):1040-9. PubMed ID: 15977734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predictions of psychophysical measurements for sinusoidal amplitude modulated (SAM) pulse-train stimuli from a stochastic model.
Xu Y; Collins LM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Aug; 54(8):1389-98. PubMed ID: 17694859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Changes across time in spike rate and spike amplitude of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains.
Zhang F; Miller CA; Robinson BK; Abbas PJ; Hu N
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 8(3):356-72. PubMed ID: 17562109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Insertion trauma and recovery of function after cochlear implantation: Evidence from objective functional measures.
Pfingst BE; Hughes AP; Colesa DJ; Watts MM; Strahl SB; Raphael Y
Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):98-105. PubMed ID: 26209185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
