BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

986 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27594698)

  • 1. An open-source solution for advanced imaging flow cytometry data analysis using machine learning.
    Hennig H; Rees P; Blasi T; Kamentsky L; Hung J; Dao D; Carpenter AE; Filby A
    Methods; 2017 Jan; 112():201-210. PubMed ID: 27594698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality Control for High-Throughput Imaging Experiments Using Machine Learning in Cellprofiler.
    Bray MA; Carpenter AE
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1683():89-112. PubMed ID: 29082489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between two programs for image analysis, machine learning and subsequent classification.
    Ribeiro GP; Endringer DC; De Andrade TU; Lenz D
    Tissue Cell; 2019 Jun; 58():12-16. PubMed ID: 31133239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Label-free cell cycle analysis for high-throughput imaging flow cytometry.
    Blasi T; Hennig H; Summers HD; Theis FJ; Cerveira J; Patterson JO; Davies D; Filby A; Carpenter AE; Rees P
    Nat Commun; 2016 Jan; 7():10256. PubMed ID: 26739115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Classification of Human White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning for Stain-Free Imaging Flow Cytometry.
    Lippeveld M; Knill C; Ladlow E; Fuller A; Michaelis LJ; Saeys Y; Filby A; Peralta D
    Cytometry A; 2020 Mar; 97(3):308-319. PubMed ID: 31688997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A cell-level quality control workflow for high-throughput image analysis.
    Qiu M; Zhou B; Lo F; Cook S; Chyba J; Quackenbush D; Matzen J; Li Z; Mak PA; Chen K; Zhou Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):280. PubMed ID: 32615917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective detection of apoptosis in rat renal tissue sections using light microscopy and free image analysis software with subsequent machine learning: Detection of apoptosis in renal tissue.
    Macedo ND; Buzin AR; de Araujo IB; Nogueira BV; de Andrade TU; Endringer DC; Lenz D
    Tissue Cell; 2017 Feb; 49(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 28073590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image3C, a multimodal image-based and label-independent integrative method for single-cell analysis.
    Accorsi A; Box AC; Peuß R; Wood C; Sánchez Alvarado A; Rohner N
    Elife; 2021 Jul; 10():. PubMed ID: 34286692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated Classification of Cellular Phenotypes Using Machine Learning in Cellprofiler and CellProfiler Analyst.
    Kornhuber M; Dunst S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2488():207-226. PubMed ID: 35347691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CellProfiler Analyst 3.0: accessible data exploration and machine learning for image analysis.
    Stirling DR; Carpenter AE; Cimini BA
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Nov; 37(21):3992-3994. PubMed ID: 34478488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cellular analysis by open-source software for affordable cytometry.
    Mittag A; Pinto FE; Endringer DC; Tarnok A; Lenz D
    Scanning; 2011; 33(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 21319173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advanced Cell Classifier: User-Friendly Machine-Learning-Based Software for Discovering Phenotypes in High-Content Imaging Data.
    Piccinini F; Balassa T; Szkalisity A; Molnar C; Paavolainen L; Kujala K; Buzas K; Sarazova M; Pietiainen V; Kutay U; Smith K; Horvath P
    Cell Syst; 2017 Jun; 4(6):651-655.e5. PubMed ID: 28647475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative image based apoptotic index measurement using multispectral imaging flow cytometry: a comparison with standard photometric methods.
    Henery S; George T; Hall B; Basiji D; Ortyn W; Morrissey P
    Apoptosis; 2008 Aug; 13(8):1054-63. PubMed ID: 18543109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polarization imaging and classification of Jurkat T and Ramos B cells using a flow cytometer.
    Feng Y; Zhang N; Jacobs KM; Jiang W; Yang LV; Li Z; Zhang J; Lu JQ; Hu XH
    Cytometry A; 2014 Sep; 85(9):817-26. PubMed ID: 25044756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imaging flow cytometry analysis of intracellular pathogens.
    Haridas V; Ranjbar S; Vorobjev IA; Goldfeld AE; Barteneva NS
    Methods; 2017 Jan; 112():91-104. PubMed ID: 27642004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reconstructing cell cycle and disease progression using deep learning.
    Eulenberg P; Köhler N; Blasi T; Filby A; Carpenter AE; Rees P; Theis FJ; Wolf FA
    Nat Commun; 2017 Sep; 8(1):463. PubMed ID: 28878212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complete blood cell count in psittaciformes by using high-throughput image cytometry: a pilot study.
    Beaufrère H; Ammersbach M; Tully TN
    J Avian Med Surg; 2013 Sep; 27(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 24344512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting single-cell gene expression profiles of imaging flow cytometry data with machine learning.
    Chlis NK; Rausch L; Brocker T; Kranich J; Theis FJ
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Nov; 48(20):11335-11346. PubMed ID: 33119742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A weakly supervised deep learning approach for label-free imaging flow-cytometry-based blood diagnostics.
    Otesteanu CF; Ugrinic M; Holzner G; Chang YT; Fassnacht C; Guenova E; Stavrakis S; deMello A; Claassen M
    Cell Rep Methods; 2021 Oct; 1(6):100094. PubMed ID: 35474892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative Functional Morphology by Imaging Flow Cytometry.
    Vorobjev IA; Barteneva NS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1389():3-11. PubMed ID: 27460234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 50.