These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
759 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27595378)
1. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy During Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance. Tran GN; Leapman MS; Nguyen HG; Cowan JE; Shinohara K; Westphalen AC; Carroll PR Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 27595378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes. Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Mendhiratta N; Fenstermaker M; Huang R; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Marshall S; Deng FM; Zhou M; Melamed J; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):512-7. PubMed ID: 26112001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standardized Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reporting Using the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation Criteria and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion with Transperineal Saturation Biopsy to Select Men on Active Surveillance. Dieffenbacher S; Nyarangi-Dix J; Giganti F; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Müller-Wolf MB; Schütz V; Gasch C; Hatiboglu G; Hauffe M; Stenzinger A; Duensing S; Schlemmer HP; Moore CM; Hohenfellner M; Radtke JP Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jan; 7(1):102-110. PubMed ID: 30878348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Active Surveillance. Ma TM; Tosoian JJ; Schaeffer EM; Landis P; Wolf S; Macura KJ; Epstein JI; Mamawala M; Carter HB Eur Urol; 2017 Feb; 71(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 27236496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer improves Gleason score assessment in favorable risk prostate cancer. Kamrava M; Kishan AU; Margolis DJ; Huang J; Dorey F; Lieu P; Kupelian PA; Marks LS Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 26059510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Role of Systematic and Targeted Biopsies in Light of Overlap on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy. Patel N; Cricco-Lizza E; Kasabwala K; Xu C; Robinson BD; Khani F; Wang Y; Margolis D; Hu JC Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 1(4):263-267. PubMed ID: 31100246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy. Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies. Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Blondin D; Quentin M; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Gabbert HE; Becker N; Antoch G; Albers P; Schimmöller L Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 26116294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance. Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy a useful addition to systematic confirmatory biopsy in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Schoots IG; Nieboer D; Giganti F; Moore CM; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ BJU Int; 2018 Dec; 122(6):946-958. PubMed ID: 29679430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing the Number of Cores Targeted During Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Target Biopsy. Kenigsberg AP; Renson A; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Wysock JS; Taneja SS; Bjurlin MA Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):418-425. PubMed ID: 31158081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy in Patients with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Under Active Surveillance Undergoing Surveillance Biopsy. Borkowetz A; Renner T; Platzek I; Toma M; Herout R; Baunacke M; Groeben C; Huber J; Laniado M; Baretton GB; Froehner M; Zastrow S; Wirth MP Urol Int; 2018; 100(2):155-163. PubMed ID: 29339663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer. Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Prospective Comparison of Selective Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion-Targeted and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies for Detecting Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeated Biopsies. Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS Urol Int; 2017; 99(4):384-391. PubMed ID: 28651247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies. Wegelin O; Exterkate L; van der Leest M; Kummer JA; Vreuls W; de Bruin PC; Bosch JLHR; Barentsz JO; Somford DM; van Melick HHE Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):582-590. PubMed ID: 30522912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators. Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Active Surveillance Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study (ASIST): Results of a Randomized Multicenter Prospective Trial. Klotz L; Loblaw A; Sugar L; Moussa M; Berman DM; Van der Kwast T; Vesprini D; Milot L; Kebabdjian M; Fleshner N; Ghai S; Chin J; Pond GR; Haider M Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):300-309. PubMed ID: 30017404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Koch R; Wirth M; Zastrow S BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):873-9. PubMed ID: 25523210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of Serial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance After 1 Yr Follow-up. Hamoen EHJ; Hoeks CMA; Somford DM; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Oddens JR; Smits GA; Bokhorst LP; Witjes JA; Rovers MM; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO Eur Urol Focus; 2019 May; 5(3):407-415. PubMed ID: 29331622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]